ORDER :

(1) The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India with the following prayers:-

“i) the impugned order dated 28.11.2008 (Annex.P/1) passed by learned S.D.O., impugned judgment dated 21.12.2009 (Annex.P/3) passed by learned Single Member and impugned judgments dated 30.07.2013 (Annex.P/5) and judgment dated 13.11.2014 (Annex.P/7) may kindly be declared as illegal and be quashed and set aside;

ii) That if during the pendency of the writ petition the petitioner is dispossessed from the land in question or if the physical possession is taken away by the respondents from the petitioner then the same be declared illegal and the respondents may kindly be directed to restore the possession in favour of the petitioner forthwith with cost;

iii) that if any other order/direction/action is passed/ taken during the pendency of the writ petition prejudicial to the interest of the petitioner, the same also be kindly be called for and be declared illegal and be quashed and set aside.”

(2) The facts in nutshell giving relevant for the present controversy are that the respondents Nos.4 to 6 and Smt. Kanku Bai (deceased) filed an application under