Back
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Mst. Gyarsi Bai – Appellant
Versus
Board Of Revenue, Ajmer – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The matter pertains to the year 1998, and thus, listed under the category of “Oldest Cases for Early Disposal”.
2. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred claiming the following reliefs:
(ii) by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondent No.4 be restrained not to interfere in the peaceful possession of the land in dispute situated at Kotrikalan.
(iii) any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon’ble Court deem just and proper by passed in favour of the Petitioner.
(iv) Costs of the writ petition be allowed to the Petitioner.”
3. As per the pleaded facts, the petitioner instituted a suit bearing no.210/234 under Sections 88 & 188 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act of 1955’) for declaration and permanent injunc
Mutation entries in revenue record are only for a fiscal purpose and do not create any title/ownership right in favour of person in whose name mutation entry has been made.
Mutation proceedings under the U.P. Land Revenue Act do not confer title and are subject to the outcome of civil suits regarding property rights.
Mutation proceedings under the U.P. Land Revenue Act do not confer title and are subject to civil suits for declaration of rights.
Mutation proceedings under the U.P. Land Revenue Act do not confer title, and jurisdiction to decide title issues lies solely with civil courts.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
