SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1232

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI, J.
Anuradha (Miss) D/o Shri Suresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University – Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14669 of 2023, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14731 of 2023, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14855 of 2023
Decided on : 05-10-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Nihar Jain a/w Dr. Nikhil Dungawat
For the Respondent: Mr. D.S. Beniwal

The court emphasized that the blame for wrongful admission lies more upon the institution than the candidates and that the respondents cannot discriminate between similarly situated students in the same examination when admissions were granted as per the guidelines in vogue at the relevant time.

Headnote:

Admission - Ph.D. Program in Agriculture - 2023-24 - [M.Sc Ag. (Agronomy)] - [Section 6 of the Agricultural University Kota Act, 2013, Section 14(3)(iv) of the Act of 2013] - The court allowed the writ petitions and directed the respondents to restore the admissions of the petitioners in the Course(s) in question.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners were admitted to pursue Post Graduation Degree [M.Sc Ag. (Agronomy)] from Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences Prayagraj (U.P.) and applied for admission in the Ph.D program in Agriculture. The respondents cancelled the petitioners' admission citing non-fulfillment of essential qualifications.

Finding of the Court:

The court observed that the petitioners possess valid Post Graduation Degrees recognized by the respondents and were eligible for admission as per the guidelines. The court found the cancellation of admission to be illegal and arbitrary.

Issues: The main issue was the cancellation of the petitioners' admission based on non-fulfillment of essential qualifications as per the guidelines for Ph.D Entrance Examination 2023.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on previous judgments to establish that the blame for wrongful admission lies more upon the institution than the candidates. It also emphasized that the respondents cannot discriminate between similarly situated students in the same examination when admissions were granted as per the guidelines in vogue at the relevant time.

Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petitions and directed the respondents to immediately restore the admissions of the petitioners in the Course(s) in question.

JUDGMENT :

1. These writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India have been preferred claiming the following reliefs:

    SBCWP No.14669/2023 :

“It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed and by an appropriate writ order or direction:

A] By an appropriate writ order or direction, the impugned office orders dated 18.09.2023 & 18.09.2023 (Annex.-17) cancelling the petitioners’ admission may kindly be quashed and set aside.

B] By an appropriate writ order or direction, the respondents may be directed to restore the petitioners’ admission to the Ph.D. program in Agriculture for the academic session 2023-24 and further allow them to pursue their Ph.D. Degree in their respective subjects and respective institutes.

C] By an appropriate writ order or direction, the respondents may be restrained from conducting on-spot counseling for the seats for which the petitioners have already been granted admission to pursue their Ph.D. degree courses.

D] By an appropriate writ order or direction, the respondents may be restrained from taking any further adverse actions against the petitioners’ admission during their course of study.

E] Any other appropriate order or relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case may also kindly be passed in favour of the humble petitioners.

F] Cost of litigation may kindly be awarded to the humble petitioners.

SBCWP No.14731/2023 :

“It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed and by an appropriate writ order or direction:

A] By an appropriate writ order or direction, the impugned office order dated 16.09.2023 (Annex.-17) cancelling the petitioners’ admission may kindly be quashed and set aside.

B] By an appropriate writ order or direction, the respondents may be directed to restore the petitioners’ admission to the Ph.D. program in Agriculture for the academic session 2023- 24 and further allow them to pursue her Ph.D. Degree.

C] By an appropriate writ order or direction, the respondents be restrained from conducting on-spot counseling for the seats for which the petitioner has already been granted admission to pursue her Ph.D. degree courses.

D] By an appropriate writ order or direction, the respondents may be restrained from taking any further adverse actions against the petitioners’ admission during her course of study.

E] Any other appropriate order or relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case may also kindly be passed in favour of the humble petitioner.

F] Cost of litigation may kindly be awarded to the humble petitioner.”

SBCWP No.14855/2023 :

“It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed and by an appropriate writ order or direction:

A] By an appropriate writ order or direction, the impugned office order dated 20.09.2023 (Annex.-17) cancelling the petitioners’ admission may kindly be quashed and set aside.

B] By an appropriate writ order or direction, the respondents may be directed to restore the petitioners’ admission to the Ph.D. program in Agriculture for the academic session 2023-24 and further allow them to pursue their Ph.D. Degree in their respective subjects and respective Institutes.

C] By an appropriate writ order or direction, the respondents be restrained from conducting on-spot counseling for the seats for which the petitioners have already been granted admission to pursue their Ph.D. degree courses.

D] By an appropriate writ order or direction, the respondents may be restrained from taking any further adverse actions against the petitioners’ admission during their course of study.

E] Any other appropriate order or relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case may also kindly be passed in favour of the humble petitioners.

F] Cost of litigation may kindly be awarded to the hu

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top