SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Raj) 49

FARJAND ALI
Kalu Khan, S/o. Shri Khurshed Khan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Shreekant Verma, Mr. Anil Gupta.
For the Respondents: Mr. Abhishek Purohit.

JUDGMENT :

1. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14-A SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with FIR No.122/2023 registered at the Police Station Rajiyasar, District Sri Ganganagar for the offences under Sections 323, 341 and 34 of the IPC and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, being aggrieved by the order dated 07.12.2023 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Sri Ganganagar in Criminal Misc. Bail Case No.501/2023, whereby the application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. has been rejected by the trial Court.

2. Despite intimation to the victim/complainant of the case regarding hearing of the bail plea, no one is present on his behalf.

3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant has falsely been implicated in the present case and he has nothing to do with the alleged offence. Expeditious culmination of trial is not a seeming fate and no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the appellant behind the bars. He, therefore, prays that benefit of bail may be granted to the appellant.

4. Per contra, learned learne

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top