Back
VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Dungar Singh, S/o. Ranjeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Briefly noted the facts in the present case are that the petitioner being landless agriculturist was in possession of land measuring 38 bighas but he was not aware of the khasra number of his land which is in his possession. While the petitioner was in possession of the subject piece of land, he preferred an application for regularization of the land by way of allotment. The petitioner’s application for regularization/allotment of land was considered and he was allotted a land measuring 38 bighas. The allotment of the land was made to the petitioner in the year 1977 and the land was mutated in his favour in Khasra No.134/269. After marking of the khasras in the area concerned, the petitioner came to know that the land, which is actually in his possession, is not the same land which has been mentioned in the allotment order and the land which has been allotted to him falls in Khasra No.134/269 and is slightly away from the land which is in his possesion. The land of the petitioner was demarcated as a land of Khasra No.173 of Village Bhojasar. The petitioner applied for regularization of the land under his possession situated in Khas
The main legal point established is that the purpose of land allotment for agricultural activities must be upheld, and the provisions of land exchange under Section 48 of the Act of 1955 and Rule 24A....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the obligation of the State Government to allot equivalent land to the petitioner and other persons within a stipulated period, emphasizing the nat....
Prevention of encroachment on common land - Absence of any such order from competent authority qua acceptance of offer made for seeking exchange of land, attestation of mutations, on this count alone....
As per Section 13(1) of the Act of 1954, there was a condition precedent that, if any khatedar transfers his rights or interest in land, then he shall get previous consent in writing from the State G....
The court emphasized the limitations on land allotment to educational institutions under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, and the discretionary power of the State Government i....
The court emphasized the importance of considering the circumstances and intentions of the land allottees, especially in cases involving resettlement of refugees, and held that the orders directing v....
The State largesse cannot be distributed arbitrarily, and the petitioner's mere application for land allotment did not confer any right.
The petitioners must demonstrate the violation of land allotment provisions and raise objections in a timely manner to challenge land allotment decisions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
