Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
ST Members Can Invoke Section 13B HMA If Hinduised By Customs: Chhattisgarh High Court
06 Mar 2026
Lease Cancellation Valid Even by 'In-Charge' Mining Officer Under OMMC Rules: Orissa High Court
06 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
NUPUR BHATI
U. N. Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Arjundas Khatri S/o Narayandas Ji Khatri – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
ORDER :
1. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India claiming the following reliefs:
2. Any other order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court deem fit and proper be passed in favour of the petitioners.”
2 Brief facts of the case are that an application (Annexure-1) under section 18 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act was filed for eviction of the premise situated at House No. 512, Panchratna Complex, Road No. 1, Udaipur against Late Smt Amita Prakash by respondent No. 1 Arjundas Khatri with the averments that late Smt Amita Prakash is the tenant of the premises in question and rent of Rs. 18,500/- was agreed between the parties orally. Thereafter a rent agreement was executed on 1
In an eviction suit, only the landlord and tenant are necessary parties for the decision of the suit, as per the provisions of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act and established legal principles.
The landlord is required to prove the existence of the relationship of landlord and tenant and the grounds for eviction, and the title to the premises in dispute is not essential for the decision of ....
In a tenancy suit, only the landlord and the tenant are necessary parties for the decision of the suit, and the impleading of remaining legal representatives may not be necessary.
The Rent Controller cannot condone any delay in filing a leave to defend application, and a corporate entity can maintain an eviction petition for its bona fide need.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article