S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Supreme Court Grants Bail to Porsche Father in Swap Case
11 Mar 2026
Natural Gas Supplies Prioritized Under Section 3 Essential Commodities Act Amid LNG Disruptions: Central Govt Order
11 Mar 2026
Delhi High Court Directs Ministries, CBFC to Implement Film Accessibility Features for Disabled Persons per RPWD Act Guidelines
11 Mar 2026
Foreign Nationals Entitled to Article 22(1) Grounds of Arrest in Known Language: Karnataka HC Sets at Liberty but Orders Handover to FRRO
11 Mar 2026
Madras HC Permits CBSE Student to Appear for Maths as Additional Subject Despite Policy Violation in Peculiar 'Rat Race' Circumstances
11 Mar 2026
Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Neha Rathore
11 Mar 2026
Menaka Guruswamy Elected India's First Openly Queer Rajya Sabha MP
11 Mar 2026
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI, MADAN GOPAL VYAS
All Residents of Ansal Sushant City, Jodhpur – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
ORDER :
1. The instant petitions as Public Interest Litigation (PIL) have been preferred claiming the following reliefs:
10. Relief prayed for:
It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed with costs and:
(A) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to make arrangement for supply of drinking water in the Ansal Sushant City colony.
(B) Any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioners and in public at large.
11. Interim order, if prayed for:
(I) On the facts and grounds mentioned in the annexed PIL and the affidavits, it is most humbly and respectfully prayed that during the pendency of the writ petition, the respondents may kindly be directed to make arrangements for drinking water by way of connecting the colony through th
The right to safe drinking water is a fundamental right under Indian law, necessitating strict adherence to sanitation standards to prevent health crises such as jaundice outbreaks.
Unfairness of demanding arrears based on retrospective reassessment of water charges when a concluded contract and benefit passed on to consumers.
Court emphasizes the need for effective monitoring of groundwater contamination and assures equitable supply of potable water to affected areas.
Local self-governments cannot disown liability for contractual obligations when acknowledged by their own decisions and higher governmental directives.
Water crisis in Delhi – Issue concerning sharing of Yamuna water between States who are signatories of MoU dated 12.05.1994 is complex and sensitive issue and this Court does not have expertise to de....
The petitioners lacked enforceable rights for water use, and complex facts required civil court resolution.
Community interest prevails over individual concerns in public projects, and unsubstantiated objections do not merit judicial intervention.
Narmada Bachao Andolan vs. Union of India
-
Read summaryA.P. Pollution Control Board II vs. Prof. M.V. Nayudu (Retd.) and Others
-
Read summary
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.