Raju S/o Shubh Ram vs State, Through P. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(Raj) 308

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI, MUNNURI LAXMAN
Raju S/o Shubh Ram – Appellant
Versus
State, Through P. P. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Vikas Bijarnia
For the Respondent: Mr. R.R. Chhaparwal, PP Mr. Surendra Bana

JUDGMENT :

Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J:

1. This Criminal Appeal under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. has been preferred claiming the following reliefs:

“It is therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that this appeal may kindly be allowed and the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 06.12.2019 passed by learned Addl.Sessions Judge No.2, Rajgarh District Churu in Sessions Case No. 11/2016 may kindly be quashed and set aside and the appellant may kindly be acquitted from the charges levelled against him.”

2. The accused-appellant laid a challenge to the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 06.12.2019 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.2, Rajgarh, District Churu, in Sessions Case No.11/2016 CIS No.23/2016 (State of Rajasthan Vs. Raju), whereby the accused-appellant has been convicted and sentenced as below:

Offence under Section	Sentence	Fine
449 IPC	10 Years’ R.I.	Rs.10,000/-, in default, to undergo further 03 Months’ Imprisonment
455 IPC	07 Years’ R.I.	Rs.10,000/-, in default, to undergo further 03 Months’ Imprisonment
302 IPC	Life Imprisonment	Rs.50,000/-,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2024 Supreme(Raj) 308

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI, MUNNURI LAXMANRaju S/o Shubh Ram – AppellantVersusState, Through P. P. – Respondent

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI, MUNNURI LAXMAN
Raju S/o Shubh Ram – Appellant
Versus
State, Through P. P. – Respondent