SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1868

DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Ishwar Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, P.P, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.53/2021, Police Station Pratap Nagar, District Jaipur, for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code (rejection order dated 27.05.2021 has been passed for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 406 of the I.P.C.).

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor, present-in-person. Perused the material available on record.

Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that offences are triable by the Magistrate; that in similar nature case, benefit of bail has been granted to the accused by this Court; charge-sheet has been filed and the trial will take long time. With these submis- sions, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application of the accused-petitioner and stated that nine other cases of likewise nature have been registered against the accused- petitioner.

Having regard to the totality of facts and circumstances, par-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top