Back
ASHOK KUMAR GAUR
Nirmala Rathore – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to land acquisition notifications (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. petitioners' objections and arguments against acquisition (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 14) |
| 3. cala's determination and award of compensation (Para 12 , 13 , 15 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. respondents' counterarguments and maintainability issues (Para 21 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. court's legal reasoning on objections and acquisition validity (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 6. final judgment and dismissal of petition (Para 35 , 39 , 50) |
JUDGMENT
The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners challenging the validity of notification dated 21.08.2018 and declaration dated 21.12.2018 issued under Section 3A(1) and 3D respectively of the NATIONAL HIGHWAYS ACT , 1956 (hereinafter shall be referred to as 'the Act of 1956') and the award dated 08.03.2019 passed under Section 3G of the Act of 1956.
2. The facts, as pleaded in the writ petition, in nutshell, are that father of the petitioners had purchased land in February, 2002 admeasuring 0.64 hectare in Khasra No.4177 of village Pinan, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Alwar. The land use of the aforesaid land was converted for petrol pump measuring 1973.94 Sq.Mtrs. and further the lan
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
