SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 2275

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Chandrakant – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Chakravarti Singh Rathore, Advocate, S.K. Bhati, Advocate, Jagdish Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - The present misc. petition has been filed for quashing the FIR No.54/2021 registered at Police Station Bagra, District Jalore for the offence under Sections 498-A, 323, 406, 376/511 & 504 IPC.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have compromised the matter. The compromise deed is placed on record.

4. The fact of compromise is not disputed by learned counsel for respondent No. 2.

5 .Learned Public Prosecutor as per the factual report submits that although the FIR was registered under Section 498-A, 323, 406, 376/511 & 504 IPC, however, the police is proposing to file charge-sheet only under Section 498-A, 406, 323 IPC.

6. The factual report is taken on record.

7. Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab, (2012) 10 SCC 303, State of M.P. V/s Laxmi Narayan & Ors. [AIR 2019 SC 1296] & Ram Gopal and Ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (Criminal Appeal No. 1489 and 1488 of 2012 decided on 29.09.2021) and prays that the FIR may be quashed.

8. In view of the aforementioned compromise arrived at between

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top