Back
ARUN BHANSALI
Shrikant Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Jaipur Vidyut – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Arun Bhansali, J. - This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved against the order dated 8.9.2021, whereby, in contemplation of inquiry, the petitioner has been placed under suspension.
2. Submissions have been made by learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents are not justified in placing the petitioner under suspension, inasmuch as, the said suspension is outcome of a complaint made against the petitioner.
3. Further submissions have been made that no opportunity of hearing was provided to the petitioner before passing of the order dated 8.9.2021 and on that count also, the order of suspension is bad.
4. I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and have perused the order impugned.
5. The order impugned clearly spells out that in contemplation of inquiry the petitioner has been placed under suspension. Learned counsel for the petitioner has failed to point out any infirmity in the order passed by the disciplinary authority.
6. The submission made regarding providing opportunity of hearing has no basis. Providing opportunity of hearing before passing of order is not contemplated by any provision and, therefore, ap
The court established that a suspension in contemplation of an inquiry does not necessitate a prior hearing, affirming the discretion of the disciplinary authority.
The court affirmed that an employee's suspension can be validly issued without formal reinstatement following a prior suspension, provided the employer-employee relationship continues.
A suspension order must be issued by the proper authority and must be justified to be legally valid.
Point of law: seriousness and gravity of the misconduct contemplated to be enquired into and the material i.e., voice messages along with the complaint by the complainant Anil Proddaturu and recordin....
Point of Law : Mandate of an outer limit of 3 (three) months is only for the purpose of drawing up a departmental proceeding and the requirement to undertake an exercise of review prior to the said p....
Suspension of a government servant must be based on serious allegations and objective consideration, with documented reasoning to prevent arbitrariness.
The suspension pending enquiry is not an order of punishment but an interim measure to facilitate the enquiry and ensure smooth disposal of proceedings.
The court upheld the suspension of a teacher for misconduct, emphasizing the need for discipline in educational institutions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
