SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 2396

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT BENCH AT JAIPUR
Dr.Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J.
Rodulal & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11876, 11877 of 2021
Decided On : 01-10-2021

Advocates appeared:
Amit Dadhich, Advocate, Mangal Singh Saini PP, Advocate

Bail can be granted under Section 439 Cr.P.C. when the custody of the accused is not warranted, particularly when the allegations against them are indirect and the proceedings are expected to take time.

Headnote:

[BAIL] - [CRIMINAL PROCEDURE] - [The court granted bail to the petitioners, parents of the accused, under Section 439 Cr.P.C., emphasizing that their custody was unwarranted given the circumstances and the charge-sheet already filed, indicating that the parents were facing repercussions primarily due to their relationship with the accused rather than direct involvement in the alleged crime.]

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners were arrested in connection with FIR No.190/2020 for offences under Sections 306, 376 & 120-B IPC, related to their son Babu, who was accused of blackmailing and raping a girl who subsequently committed suicide.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that while the petitioners were named in the suicide note, the primary allegations were against Babu, and their custody was not justified as they were merely trying to counsel the children.

Issues: Whether the petitioners should be granted bail considering their role in the case and the nature of the allegations against their son.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the petitioners' continued custody was not warranted, especially since the charge-sheet had been filed and they were likely facing consequences due to their relationship with the accused rather than any direct involvement in the crime.

Result: The court allowed the bail applications, directing the petitioners to be released on bail upon executing a personal bond and providing sureties.

JUDGMENT

Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J. - In wake of second surge in the COVID-19 cases, abundant caution is being maintained, while hearing the matters in Court, for the safety of all concerned.

2. This Court perused the material available on record.

3. The petitioners have been arrested in FIR No.190/2020 of Police Station Ramganjmandi, Kota Rural for the offences punishable under Sections 306, 376 & 120-B IPC. They have preferred these bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petitioners are parents of the boy, namely, Babu. Learned counsel further submits that there is allegation upon Babu for blackmailing, rape, and also pertaining to Section 306 IPC. Learned counsel also submits that the girl has committed suicide on 22.06.2020. Learned counsel further submits that the charge-sheet in this case has already been filed and the petitioners, who are the parents of Babu, were are only trying to counsel the children to move apart, but unfortunately, the incident had happened.

5. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail applications.

6. After carefully seeing the record, this Court finds that there was intense relationship between Babu and the deceased girl, which has resulted into lodging of the present FIR. Though the petitioners, who are the parents, have been named in the suicide note, but the actual role has been attributed to Babu, as he has been alleged with multiple allegations.

7. Looking into the fact that the charge-sheet in this case has already been filed and it seems to be a possibility that the petitioners are facing the wrath only on count of being the parents of Babu. Thus, this Court is of the opinion, that the custody of the petitioners in this case is not warranted, as they are in custody since 01.07.2021.

8. Thus, having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the fact that conclusion of the proceedings is likely to take some time and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

9. Accordingly, these bail applications filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is directed that petitioners (1) Rodulal S/o Ramlal and (2) Guddi Bai W/o Rodulal shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.190/2020 of Police Station Ramganjmandi, Kota Rural provided each of them execute a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top