SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 2137

DINESH MEHTA
Lal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Bhanwar Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Shambhoo Singh, for the Appellant; Mr. Abhinav Jain Through V.C., for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT :

1. By way of the present writ petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has laid challenge to the order dated 31.08.2019.

2. The facts relevant for the present purposes are that the respondent-plaintiff had filed a suit for cancellation of Will dated 27.01.2011 and to pass a decree in terms of partition deed (Bantwara) dated 05.12.2002.

3. In the suit so filed by the plaintiff-Bhanwar Singh (respondent herein), an application came to be filed on 27.10.2017 by the plaintiff- respondent himself under section 47(A) of the Rajasthan Stamp Act, 1998. Two applications of even date (06.02.2018) under Section 39 of the Stamp Act and Section 17 of the Registration Act were filed by the defendant (petitioner herein) praying that the document be returned as the same is not admissible in evidence for want of registration.

4. The learned Trial court by way of the impugned order dated 31.08.2019, rejected petitioner's applications dated 06.02.2018 in wake of order already passed on application under Section 47(A) of the Stamp Act. The trial Court considered them to be irrelevant.

5. The present petitioner has approached this Court with a case that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top