AKIL KURESHI, REKHA BORANA
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Krishna Kumar Saini – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This appeal is filed by the State Government to challenge the order of learned Single Judge dated 04.03.2021 in Civil Writ Petition No.763/2008.
2. The case has a checkered history. The respondent was engaged as a Safai Jamadar on daily wage basis on 01.04.1996. His services were terminated on 27.05.1997. He raised an industrial dispute and challenged his termination. The Labour Court passed an award in his favour on 24.02.2004 directing his reinstatement with continuity of service but without back-wages. The Department challenged this award of the Labour Court by filing the Writ Petition No.547/2005, which was dismissed on 12.01.2006. Consequently, the workman was reinstated in service on 20.04.2006. Since then, he has been working continuously. He filed a fresh petition i.e. present Writ Petition No.763/2008 and sought benefit of regularisation. The learned Single Judge disposed of the writ petition by impugned judgment with following observations and directions:-
Hargurpratap Singh vrs. State of Punjab and others reported in (2007) 13 SCC 292
Narendra Kumar Tiwari and Ors. vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.
State of Karnataka and Ors. vs. M.L. Kesari and Ors. (2010) 9 SCC 247
The court established that continuous service post-reinstatement qualifies an employee for regularization, despite prior court intervention.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.