SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 2026

PANKAJ BHANDARI
Satpal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Harendra Singh, for the Appellant; Mr. Sher Singh Mahla, PP, for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. Matter comes up on an application seeking stay of the judgment of conviction dated 25.06.2019 passed against the accused-appellant.

2. It is contended by counsel for the appellant that an application for suspension of sentence was allowed by the Court on 19.08.2019. However, now on the basis of the conviction, State has passed the order dated 18.02.2021, dismissing the appellant from the service. It is also contended that the appellant married the complainant on 02.11.2006 and a child was born out of the wed-lock in the year 2008. The Court below has convicted the appellant for offence under Section 498-A I.P.C. as well as for offence under Section 376 I.P.C. It is argued that if the conviction is for offence under Section 498-A of I.P.C., conviction under Section 376 I.P.C. cannot be sustained and vice-versa.

3. Counsel for the appellant placed reliance on 'Jagdish Prasad vs. State of Rajasthan' 2013 SCC Online Raj 450., 'Mahmood Khan vs. State of Rajasthan' (S.B. Criminal Misc. Stay Application No.6932/2017 in S.B. Criminal Appeal No.62/2009), 'Rama Narang vs. Ramesh Narang & Ors.' (1995) 2 SCC 513, 'Avinash vs. State of Rajasthan' (S.B. Criminal Misc. Stay Application No

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top