RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT BENCH AT JAIPUR
Mr. Akil Kureshi, Rekha Borana, JJ.
Managing Committee - Appellant
Versus
Ghanshyam Sharma & Ors. - Respondents
D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 280 of 2021
Decided On : 17-12-2021
Rajasthan - Educational Institutions - Rajasthan Non Government Educational Institutions Act, 1989 - Sections 21, 31(2) - The court interpreted the provisions of the Act, emphasizing the obligation of the State to ensure payment of dues to employees of non-government aided institutions, regardless of their absorption status with the State Government.
Fact of the Case:
Employees of non-government educational institutions sought benefits under the Rajasthan Non Government Educational Institutions Act, 1989, including selection scale and gratuity. The Tribunal ruled against the management, leading to appeals by the management.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the learned Single Judge incorrectly limited the applicability of a prior judgment to only those employees absorbed by the State Government, disregarding the broader implications of the judgment.
Issues: Whether the principles established in the Bhagwan Das Todi case apply only to employees absorbed by the State Government or to all similarly situated employees.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Bhagwan Das Todi judgment is a judgment in rem, applicable to all employees entitled to dues under the Act, not just those absorbed by the State Government.
Result: The appeals were allowed, and the Tribunal's order was set aside, directing the management to prepare a statement of dues for the employees.
JUDGMENT
Borana, J. - The present three Special Appeals are decided by this Common Order as the two writ petitions (Ghanshyam Sharma & Rajesh Chandra Sharma) have been decided by the learned Single Judge in terms of the Judgment passed in the third writ petition pertaining to Sudha Gupta. For sake of convenience, facts of Writ Petition No.5508/2017 (Ghanshyam Sharma) are being narranted.
2. The brief facts of the case are as under:
3. The respondent-applicants (employees) moved an application under Section 21 of the Rajasthan Non Government Educational Institutions Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act of 1989') before the Rajasthan Non Government Educational Institutions Tribunal, Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal') for seeking relief of benefit of selection scale, amount of leave encashment, gratuity and provident fund.
4. During the pendency of said application, the Division Bench Judgment of this Court in D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 663/2015; State of Rajasthan & ors. Vs. The Management Committee Shri Bhagwan Das Todi College came to be pronounced on 06.11.2015 and therefore, an application was moved on behalf of the Management before the Tribunal on 04.08.2016 with a prayer to decide the matters in terms of the judgment passed in Bhagwan Das Todi's case.
5. The learned Tribunal proceeded on to decide the application vide its order dated 08.11.2016 against which the appellant- Managing Committee preferred the present writ petition before this Court. While issuing notices in the writ petition, an interim order was passed on 20.04.2017 in favour of the petitioners by the learned Single Judge which was continued till further orders from time to time.
6. On 16.12.2020, an application was preferred by the petitioners for extension of the interim order dated 27.11.2017. It has been averred by the counsel for the appellants that the learned Single Judge, instead of deciding the said application, decided the writ petition itself on 13.01.2021 totally in contravention to the judgment of the Division Bench passed in Bhagwan Das Todi's case. The learned Single Judge proceeded on to decide the writ petition relying upon the judgment dated 20.09.2019 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3081/2016; Managing Committee & Another Versus Sudha Gupta & Another wherein the judgment as passed in Bhagwan Das Todi had been considered.
7. In Sudha Gupta's case, the learned Single Judge held as under:
In view of the above, this Court is of the firm opinion that the directions would be confined only to those employees who have been absorbed with the State Government and would not extend to those employees, who retired while working with the institution(s) and are claiming their dues as against the institution(s). Since, admittedly the employees stood already retired, it is the duty of the institution to pay the entire amount as claimed by the employees and if they have any case for reimbursement from the State Government, they can always get the aid to be released from the concerned State Government. It is made clear that if such reimbursement is claimed in terms of the aid being given to the institution, the said reimbursement shall be released by the State Government.
Accordingly, no case for interference is made out. The writ petition is found to be devoid of merit and the same is accordingly dismissed. Due payment be made with
The court established that the State is obligated to ensure payment of dues to all employees of non-government aided institutions, irrespective of their employment status with the State.
Private unaided educational institutions are not obligated to pay salaries equivalent to Government/Aided institutions as per the Act and Rules, and the employee's entitlement is governed by the term....
The court mandates timely consideration of salary arrears for employees of Non-Government Educational Institutions based on established judicial precedents.
Salary – Leave encashment is part of salary – In present case, management establishment was recipient of 70% aid, in form of grant – State cannot shrug its responsibility to shoulder its part of resp....
The court held that the petitioner-institution is liable to pay gratuity and leave encashment to respondent-employees for their service period, as per the applicable rules and acts.
The State Government's liability for salary payments to college staff as per Section 60-E of the U.P. State Universities Act, 1973, and the inability of government orders to override statutory rules.
Denial of pension to employees of aided institutions appointed prior to promulgation of Rajasthan Civil Services (Contributory) Pension Rules, 2005 at par with Government servants as per Pension Rule....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the obligation of the respondents to make payment of arrears of salary and other dues, as well as to grant approval and release grant-in-aid within....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.