Renu Setia vs State of Rajasthan - 2023 Supreme(Raj) 1560

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1560

FARJAND ALI
Renu Setia – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Ms.Aarti Sharma, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. A.R. Choudhary, PP, for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. The legality, correctness and propriety of the order dated 05.07.2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.2, Hanumangarh in Criminal Revision Petition No.72/2015 has been assailed by the petitioner by way of filing the instant Criminal Revision Petition.

2. Bereft of elaborated details, the brief facts giving rise to the instant criminal revision petition which are necessary for disposal of the petition are that the petitioner-Dr. Renu Setia is a Gynecologist, duly approved by the Medical Council of India, who was running a hospital in the name and style of Bombay Hospital at Hanumangarh Junction. On the fateful day i.e. 15.09.2008 at 6:00 A.M. a lady named Pinki W/o Rajesh Kumar was admitted in the Bombay Hospital, Hanumangarh, as she was having labour pain. She was taken to labour room at 5:00 p.m. On the very same day, it was observed that the child had died in her womb. It was alleged that despite repeated request, the petitioner did not turn up to take care of her and as a consequence of which, the patient Pinki, mother of the child also died due to negligent conduct of the petitioner and medical attendant Praveen. After investigation, a charge sheet for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document