SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1096

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Karamjit Singh, J.
Dr. Anil Kumar - Petitioner - Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana - Respondent - Respondent
CRR-122 of 2018 (O&M)
Decided On : 27-04-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. R.S. Cheema, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Sumanjit Kaur, Advocate, for the petitioner in CRR-122-2018.
Mr. Tanvir S. Grewal, Advocate, for the petitioner in CRR-4892-2017. Mr. Mukesh Yadav, Advocate, for the complainant in both the cases. Mr. Vishal Kashyap, DAG, Haryana

The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of expert medical opinion in cases of alleged medical negligence and the need for a high degree of negligence to establish criminal liability. The judgment also emphasized the necessity of sanction from the State Government for prosecuting public servants for alleged negligence in the discharge of their official duties.

Headnote:

Medical Negligence - Criminal Prosecution - Section 304A IPC - [MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE] - [Criminal Prosecution, Section 304A IPC] - The court discussed the requirement of sanction under Section 197 CrPC for prosecuting public servants for alleged negligence in the discharge of their official duties. It emphasized the need for expert medical opinion in cases of medical negligence and highlighted the importance of considering medical reports in such cases. The court also emphasized that criminal prosecution of medical professionals for negligence under criminal law must demonstrate a high degree of negligence, as established in Jacob Mathew v. State of Punjab (2005) 6 SCC 1. The judgment set aside the lower court's decision and acquitted the petitioners based on the lack of medical negligence and the absence of sanction from the State Government for their prosecution.

Fact of the Case:

The case involved the death of a woman due to alleged medical negligence by a doctor and a nurse in a government hospital. The complainant alleged that the doctor and nurse were negligent in providing care, leading to the death of the patient. Multiple medical opinions were sought, and the reports indicated no medical negligence on the part of the accused. The court highlighted the importance of expert medical opinion and the need for a high degree of negligence to establish criminal liability.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the medical reports indicated no medical negligence on the part of the accused and emphasized the requirement of expert medical opinion in cases of alleged negligence. It also ruled that criminal prosecution of the accused without the sanction of the State Government, as required under Section 197 of Cr.P.C., was not maintainable.

Issues: The key issues included the requirement of expert medical opinion in cases of medical negligence, the need for a high degree of negligence to establish criminal liability, and the necessity of sanction from the State Government for prosecuting public servants for alleged negligence in the discharge of their official duties.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of expert medical opinion in cases of alleged medical negligence and highlighted the need for a high degree of negligence to establish criminal liability. It also ruled that criminal prosecution of public servants for alleged negligence in the discharge of their official duties requires the sanction of the State Government under Section 197 of Cr.P.C.

Final Decision: The court set aside the lower court's decision and acquitted the petitioners based on the lack of medical negligence and the absence of sanction from the State Government for their prosecution.

KARAMJIT SINGH, J.

1. By this common judgment, two petitions bearing CRR-122-2018; Dr. Anil Kumar v. State of Haryana and CRR-4892-2017; Kamlesh v. State of Haryana shall be decided as both these petitions relate to same subject matter and relief sought in both the petitions is also the same. Facts are being taken from CRR-122-2018.

2. CRR-122-2018 has been filed by Dr. Anil Kumar while CRR- 4892-2017 is filed by Kamlesh against judgment dated 15.12.2017 passed by Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Narnaul whereby the criminal appeals filed by the petitioners against the judgment and order dated 20.7.2016 passed by the Court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Mahendergarh wherein the petitioners were convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for a period of 2 years and to pay compensation of Rs. 20,000/- each to complainant-Dharambir under Section 304A IPC, were dismissed

3. The brief facts of the case are that a complaint dated 22.7.2011 was received in Police Station Kanina through the office of DSP Narnaul wherein complainant Dharambir alleged that his wife Monika was admitted in CHC Kanina on 17.1.2011, as she was having labour pain and she gave birth to a female child in the said hospital on the same day. That the staff of the hospital demanded Rs. 500/- from him on the birth of child and declined to accept Rs. 100/- offered by the complainant to them. Lateron the complainant managed to arrange Rs. 500/- and handed over the same to petitioner Kamlesh Kumari who was working as a nurse in the said hospital. After sometime the condition of Monika started deteriorating on account of excessive bleeding. The complainant tried to call petitioner Kamlesh Kumari on which she replied that bleeding usually happens in such like cases and would stop after sometime and she did not check the patient even on the request made by the complainant. Thereafter, the condition of the wife of complainant further worsened, on which the complainant went to call the doctor on duty i.e. petitioner Anil Kumar but he also did not pay any heed to the request made by the complainant and rather the said doctor scolded the complainant and asked him not to enter the ward. On this complainant again went back to his wife and found that her clothes and bed were smeared with blood and her tongue was protruding out and eyes were caved in. Thereafter, petitioner Kamlesh Kumari reached there and directed the complainant to bring injection but by the time the complainant brought the said injection from medical store, his wife had already expired. In the meantime, the hospital staff had already changed the blood stained clothes of his wife and she was referred to General Hospital Narnaul. The ambulance which was deputed to take his wife to Narnaul was having no medical facility and even no doctor or nurse accompanied the patient who appears to have died. On reaching the aforesaid hospital at Narnaul, Monika was declared brought dead by the concerned doctor. The complainant lodged complaint regarding medical negligence of Dr. Anil Kumar and concerned nurses namely Kamlesh Kumari and Raj Kumari in Police Station Kanina on 18.1.2011 but no action was initiated by the police officials. In the meantime, Dr. Anil Kumar started extending threats to the complainant and proclaimed that the complainant would not be able to do anything as the police is supporting the hospital staff. Subsequently on the basis of said complaint, FIR was registered under Section 304-A read with Section 34 IPC against Dr. Anil Kumar, Kamlesh Kumari and Raj Kumari. During investigation both the petitioners were arrested but were released on bail. However, Raj Kumari was found innocent and on completion of investigation, the police presented challan against Dr. Anil Kumar and Kamlesh Kumari.

4. A prima facie case under Section 304-A read with Section 34 IPC being made out against both the petitioners, charges were framed to which they had not pleaded guilty and claimed trial.

5. In order to prove its cas

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top