SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1634

SANDEEP MEHTA, RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI
Emc Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Vinay Kothari, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Sunil Bhandari, Advocate, for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. These two writ petitions involve identical questions of facts and law and hence, are being decided by this common order.

2. Learned counsel Shri Sunil Bhandari has put in appearance on behalf of the respondents, but reply to both the writ petitions has not been filed. Today, when the matters were taken up, Shri Bhandari submitted that the arguments can be heard without waiting for reply because purely legal issues are involved in both writ petitions.

3. Show cause notices dated 07.02.2020 and consequential orders dated 22.04.2020 passed by the respondent Deputy Commissioner, State Tax, Anti-Evasion, Bhilwara, whereby the petitioner has been called upon to explain as to why the ITC claimed by it for the Financial Years 2017-18 and 2018-19 may not be reversed are assailed in these writ petitions.

4. Replies to the show cause notices were filed by the authorized representative of the petitioner, wherein it was pertinently mentioned that the petitioner company became sick. Accordingly, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was initiated under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

5. The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Kolkata Bench, Kolkata passed a final order d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top