SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1455

GANESH RAM MEENA
Rukmani Devi Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Hari Mohan H/O, for the Appellant; Mr, Bharat Singh Gurjar, Dy.G.C., for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11373/2020

1. Mr. Hari Mohan, husband of the petitioner in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11373/2020, present in person, submits that the licence of fair price shop which was in the name of his wife, has been illegally cancelled by the respondent vide order dated 07.09.2020. It is also submitted that earlier the licence was suspended vide order dated 23.01.2020, against which he preferred Civil Writ Petition No.7827/2020, wherein the High Court passed an interim order dated 30.07.2020, staying the operation of suspension of licence of fair price shop. During pendency of the writ petition and staying the operation of the suspension order, the respondent could not cancell the fair price shop licence.

2. Per contra, learned counsel for the State submits that the order dated 07.09.2020, which is under challenge in the present writ petition is an appealable order. Clause 22 of the Rajasthan Foodgrains and Other Essential Articles (Regulation of Distribution) Order, 1976 (for short 'Order of 1976') provides for an appeal before the District Collector against the order of cancellation of fair price shop and in view of that the petitioner has alternative ef

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top