Back
S. S. SHINDE, ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Swaimadhopur – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Kumar Dhand, J. - The challenge in this appeal under section 374(2) Cr.P.C. is led to the judgment dated 22.8.1990 passed by the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Sawai Madhopur (for short 'the trial court'), in Sessions Case No.3/1988, by which the accused appellant has been convicted and sentenced as under:-
| Offence under Section | Sentence | Fine | In default of Payment of Fine |
| 302 IPC | Life Imprisonment | 200/- | One month Rigorous Imprisonment |
2. The period spent in the police/judicial custody has been ordered to be set-off in the original imprisonment.
3. The facts relevant and necessary for the disposal of this appeal are thus:-
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the 'last seen together theory' and the reliance on circumstantial evidence, medical evidence, and recovery evidence to establis....
In a murder conviction based on circumstantial evidence, multiple corroborative factors, including the last seen theory and absence of alternative explanations, can establish guilt beyond reasonable ....
Circumstantial evidence alone, especially the last seen theory without corroboration, is insufficient for conviction; guilt must be established beyond reasonable doubt.
The court upheld the conviction under IPC Section 302, emphasizing that circumstantial evidence must form a complete chain, proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt without the accused providing an adeq....
The judgment establishes the principles of circumstantial evidence, the last seen theory, and the burden of proof under Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act in establishing guilt in criminal cases.
In cases based on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must establish a complete chain of circumstances that excludes any reasonable hypothesis other than guilt, failing which the accused is enti....
The principle that an accused cannot be convicted based on suspicion alone, and the prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, especially in cases relying on circumstantial evidence.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of establishing a strong motive, proving the last seen theory, and evaluating circumstantial evidence to establish guilt beyond a re....
The prosecution must establish a complete chain of evidence, including motive, in cases based on circumstantial evidence, and the evidence must be cogent, trustworthy, and exclude every possible hypo....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
