ORDER

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The present writ petition has been filed against the order dated 26.11.2016 passed by the Debt Recovery Court, Sri Ganganagar, whereby the application preferred by the petitioner-non-applicant under Section 45 of the Evidence Act was dismissed and the order dated 27.02.2019 passed by the District Judge, Sri Ganganagar rejecting the revision petition of the petitioner.

3. Briefly, the facts giving rise to the present writ petition are that the respondent-applicant preferred a suit for recovery of money from the petitioner and during the pendency of the suit, an application was preferred by the respondent-applicant to the effect that the Promissory Note may be got examined from a Handwriting Expert for the purpose of matching the signatures of the petitioner and the respondent. The petitioner filed reply to the said application. Learned trial court after hearing the parties, allowed the application and the Promissory Note/the document in question was sent to one Shri Anil Kumar Gupta, Handwriting Expert for reporting the matter with respect to the matching of the signatures on the document (Promissory Note). After the report was receive