ORDER (COMMON)

The lis involved in these civil revision petitions and the parties are one and the same. Therefore, the same were heard together and decided by way of this common order:—

2. Heard Mr. C. Sharan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Eriga Ganesh, learned counsel for the respondent.

(for sake of convenience, hereinafter the parties are referred to as they are arrayed in suit O.S.No.199 of 2019)

3. These revisions are filed by the defendant. C.R.P.No.2343 of 2023 is filed challenging the orders all dated 13.07.2023 in I.A.No.3 of 2023; C.R.P.No.2345 of 2023 is filed against the orders in I.A.No.2 of 2023; C.R.P.No.2364 of 2023 is filed against the order in I.A.No.5 of 2023 and C.R.P.No.3077 of 2023 is filed against the order in I.A.No.04 of 2023 in O.S.No.119 of 2019 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge at Kothagudem.

4. The plaintiff had filed a suit vide O.S.No.119 of 2019 against the defendant seeking recovery of an amount of Rs.6,00,000/- with subsequent interest basing on promissory note dated 25.05.2017. It is the specific contention of the plaintiff that both the plaintiff and the defendant are Drivers in TSRTC and thus, they are acquainted with e