FARJAND ALI
Ashok @ Mulla Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP – Respondent
ORDER
1. The instant application for bail has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner Ashok @ Mulla Ram, who is in custody in relation to F.I.R. No.206/2022, Police Station Merta City, District Nagaur, for the offence under Section 8/21 of the NDPS Act.
2. His first bail application came to be rejected by this Court vide order dated 19.12.2022 (S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.9224/2022) while giving liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer after the statement of Investigating Officer is recorded in the trial and now, the statement of P.W. 1 Bhanwar Lal as well as the SHO P.W. 2 Rajveer Singh has been recorded by the learned trial Court on 19.04.2023 and 18.05.2023. Hence, the present bail application.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the seizing officer, while undertaking proceedings for search and seizure, was not posted as S.H.O. of the concerned police station. He vehemently contended that sub-section (1) of Section 42 of NDPS Act enumerates the power of officers specified therein who are duly empowered by the Central Government or the State Government as the case may be and as per the law, a SubInspector is not empowered to e
Roy V.D. Vs. State of Kerala reported in AIR 2001 SC 137
Vijaysinh Chandubha Jadeja Vs. State of Gujarat reported in AIR 2011 SC 77
Non-compliance of mandatory provisions of NDPS Act has to be dealt with a strict hand.
Only authorized officers can conduct searches and seizures under the NDPS Act; non-compliance with statutory procedures warrants bail.
Non-compliance with mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act regarding authorized officers conducting searches renders the recovery illegal, prioritizing the fundamental right to a speedy trial over stat....
The improper conduct of search and seizure under relevant law invalidates the charges and warrants bail.
The court ruled that searches conducted by unauthorized officers under the NDPS Act are illegal, warranting the grant of bail due to prolonged detention without trial.
Strict compliance with the statutory procedure and the stringent provisions of the NDPS Act are crucial in determining the admissibility of evidence and granting bail, despite the quantity of contrab....
The court ruled that unauthorized searches under the NDPS Act invalidate the evidence, warranting bail for the accused due to procedural non-compliance.
Strict adherence to the NDPS Act's provisions regarding search and seizure is essential; failure to comply can lead to the invalidation of evidence and grant of bail.
The court established that strict adherence to procedural safeguards under the NDPS Act is essential, particularly regarding informing individuals of their rights during searches.
Mandatory compliance with procedural safeguards under Section 42 of the NDPS Act is crucial for lawful search and seizure; failure to comply invalidates recovery.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.