IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Farjand Ali, J.
Mahesh Kumar S/o Shri Omprakash - Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP - Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13429/2024
Decided On : 24-10-2024
ORDER :
Farjand Ali, J.
1. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked by way of filing an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. at the instance of accused-petitioner. The requisite details of the matter are tabulated herein below:
| S.No. | Particulars of the Case | |
| 1. | FIR Number | 368/2023 |
| 2. | Concerned Police Station | Bilara |
| 3. | District | Jodhpur Rural |
| 4. | Offences alleged in the FIR | Under Section 8/15 of the NDPS Act and Sections 3/25 & 27 of the Arms Act and Section 307 of IPC |
| 5. | Offences added, if any | -- |
| 6. | Date of passing of impugned order | 01.04.2024 |
2. It is contended on behalf of the accused-petitioner that no case for the alleged offences is made out against him and his incarceration is not warranted. There are no factors at play in the case at hand that may work against grant of bail to the accused-petitioner and he has been made an accused based on conjectures and surmises.
3. Contrary to the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application and submits that the present case is not fit for enlargement of accused on bail.
4. I have considered the submissions made by both the parties and have perused the material available on record.
5. Upon consideration of the submission that co-accused Shrawan has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 08.10.2024 passed in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No.10563/2024. For ready reference the relevant part of the said order is reproduced hereinunder:-
3. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that on 25.09.2023 the SHO, PS Bilara received a telephonic information from ASI Manphool, CID, CB, Jaipur that huge quantity of poppy husk would be illegally transported in a White Creta Car bearing registration No. RJ45 CP6019 and a White Swift Desire Car bearing registration No.OD10 P3168 coming from Beawar to Jodhpur. On the basis of the said information, the SHO, PS Bilara alongwith his team during nakabandi at about 1:10 p.m. on seeing the police party, the drivers of the said Creta Car (Shrawan) and Swift Car along with one other turned down and tried to escape from the spot in high speed. During that course, the accused left their vehicles and run towards the dirt road. At some distance, the SHO Pipar caught one person who disclosed his name as Shrawan, while escaping he received injury on his leg. The other two persons were having 12 bore gun in their hands were also apprehended. They disclosed their names as Hadman Ram and Mahesh. All the accused persons were detained and during search 11 bags of poppy husk weighing 252.300 grams were recovered from Creta Car RJ45 CP6019 and 9 bags of poppy husk and Rs.56,090/- were recovered from the rear seat of Swift Car. After search and seizure, Seizing Officer took samples, marked them and sent the same to the FSL for chemical examination and a case under Section 8/15 of the NDPS Act, Section 3/25 and Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 307 of the IPC got registered. The accused were arrested.
4. It is contended on behalf of the accused-petitioner that no case for the alleged offences is made out against him and his incarceration is not warranted. There are no factors at play in the case at hand that may work against grant of bail to the accused-petitioner and he has been made an accused based on conjectures and surmises. He further submits that the accused was taken into custody on 25.09.2023 and since then he is behind the bars. Now, more than one year has been
The court ruled that unauthorized searches under the NDPS Act invalidate the evidence, warranting bail for the accused due to procedural non-compliance.
Strict adherence to the NDPS Act's provisions regarding search and seizure is essential; failure to comply can lead to the invalidation of evidence and grant of bail.
The court ruled that searches conducted by unauthorized officers under the NDPS Act are illegal, warranting the grant of bail due to prolonged detention without trial.
The court established that non-compliance with mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act, particularly regarding the sampling process, can render the prosecution's case weak and justify the grant of bail,....
Non-compliance with procedural requirements under the NDPS Act can undermine the prosecution's case and justify the grant of bail.
Procedural compliance under the NDPS Act is crucial; failure to adhere to sampling and inventory requirements can undermine the prosecution's case and justify bail.
The court emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural requirements in drug seizure cases, ruling that non-compliance can render evidence inadmissible and affect bail decisions.
Procedural compliance in the NDPS Act is crucial for the admissibility of evidence, impacting the court's discretion in granting bail.
The court emphasized the necessity of compliance with NDPS Act provisions for admissibility of evidence, granting bail due to procedural lapses and prolonged incarceration.
The court established that non-compliance with mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act, particularly regarding seizure and sampling, can create reasonable doubt about the prosecution's case, warranting ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.