Back
PANKAJ BHANDARI, BHUWAN GOYAL
Jasvinder Singh @ Kalu – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Judgment
Pankaj Bhandari, J. - The accused appellant - Jasvinder Singh @ Kalu has preferred the instant appeal aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 19.03.2015 whereby the accused appellant has been convicted for offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as 'the IPC') and has been sentenced to imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.2,000/-; in default of payment of fine, to further undergo one month imprisonment.
2. Succinctly stated the facts of the case are that on 07.08.2011, complainant - Karnail Singh had given a 'parchabayan' (Exhibit-D1) to the Station House Officer, Police Station, Bhiwadi Phase-III, Alwar stating therein that at about 12:00 noon, he had come to home after working in the fields. The house of Balwant Singh is situated nearby and the dispute was going on between them with regard to right of way. Balwant singh and his son Kalu were abusing his wife and when he asked them not to abuse, then Kalu and Banta Singh came out with guns. It is also stated that Kalu with an intention to cause death, opened fire, whereby his brother Pooran Singh sustained injuries on his chest and head. Banta Singh also fired
The court established that spontaneous actions during a heated dispute can lead to a conviction for culpable homicide rather than murder, reflecting the importance of intent in legal determinations.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of Exception-4 of Section 300 of IPC and the consideration of the right to private defence in determining the appropriate convictio....
The court held that when a death occurs from a single blow in the heat of passion during a sudden quarrel, it may be classified under Section 304 IPC instead of Section 302 IPC.
cCnduct of the appellant, from the evidence led by the prosecution itself, indicates that neither was there any premeditation nor an intention to kill the deceased.
(1) Fight between the two parties started all of a sudden as a result of obstruction caused in digging of the foundation and there is no evidence to show that the accused attacked deceased with deadl....
The appellate court modified the conviction from Section 302 to Section 304 IPC, recognizing the absence of premeditation and intention to kill during a sudden altercation influenced by the accused's....
The court established that an act committed in the heat of passion without premeditation can be classified as culpable homicide under Section 304 IPC, not murder.
Conviction for murder was altered to culpable homicide not amounting to murder due to lack of evidence for intent, emphasizing that premeditated murder requires clear intent, especially absent motive....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
