IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
FARJAND ALI, J.
Jaspal Singh, S/o. Harbansh Singh - Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP - Respondent
S.B. Criminal Misc 2nd Suspension of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 662 of 2024 In S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1830 of 2022
Decided On : 30-08-2024
Suspension - NDPS Act - Sections 8, 15, 25, 52-A - The court emphasized the importance of compliance with procedural requirements under the NDPS Act, particularly regarding the handling of seized contraband and the necessity of drawing samples in the presence of a Magistrate, which was not adhered to in this case.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant was convicted under the NDPS Act and IPC for possession of contraband and sentenced to ten years of rigorous imprisonment. The applicant contended that the trial court erred in its judgment, particularly regarding the handling of evidence.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the prosecution failed to comply with Section 52-A of the NDPS Act, which mandates proper procedures for handling seized contraband, thus rendering the FSL report inadmissible as evidence.
Issues: Whether the failure to comply with Section 52-A of the NDPS Act affects the admissibility of the FSL report and the validity of the conviction.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that non-compliance with mandatory procedural requirements under the NDPS Act undermines the prosecution's case, warranting suspension of the sentence pending appeal.
Result: The application for suspension of sentence is allowed, and the applicant is granted bail pending appeal.
ORDER :
Farjand Ali, J.
1. The instant second application for suspension of sentence has been moved on behalf of the applicant in the matter of judgment dated 14.09.2022 passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS Act Cases -cum- Additional Sessions Judge, Gulabpura District Bhilwara in Sessions Case No.08/2019 whereby he was convicted and sentenced to suffer maximum sentence rigorous imprisonment of ten years under Sections 8/15 & 8/25 of the NDPS Act and sentenced for ten years on each count alongwith fine of Rs.1,0,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo three month’s RI and awarded lesser sentence for a period of one year RI for the offence under Section 465 of the IPC along with fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default to further undergo one moth’s SI.
2. His first application for suspension was dismissed as not pressed by this Court vide order dated 05.04.2024 passed in S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application No.128 /2023. Hence, the instant application for suspension of sentence.
3. It is contended on behalf of the applicant that the learned trial Judge has not appreciated the correct, legal and factual aspects of the matter and thus, reached at an erroneous conclusion of guilt, therefore, the same is required to be appreciated again by this court being the first appellate Court. He submitted that the Seizing Officer collected the samples from the spot and sent to the FSL for its examination thus, Section 52-A of the NDPS Act has not been complied with. He is behind the bars more than five and half years. Hearing of the appeal is likely to take long time, therefore, the application for suspension of sentence may be granted.
4. Per contra, learned public prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer made on behalf of the accused-applicant for releasing the appellant on application for suspension of sentence.
5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record as also the impugned judgment.
6. It is emanating from the record that on 27.10.2018, Goverdhan Lal, SHO, PS Gulabpura along with his team during patrolling intercepted a silver colour Mahendra SUV 500 Car bearing registration No.RJ09UA7964 and upon interrogation driver of the vehicle disclosed his name as Jaspal. During search, six plastic bags containing poppy husk. The weight of these bags was 102.5 Kg. Thereafter, by adopting usual mode, investigation was undertaken and the recovered contraband was seized and the samples were marked ‘A-1’ to ‘A-6’ by the Seizing Officer wehreafter the same were sent to the FSL for its chemical examination.
7. Admittedly, the inventory though prepared but not in accordance with the mandate provided under Section 52-A of the NDPS Act, neither samples were taken on the same day nor in the presence of a Judicial Magistrate. As per the mandate of law, the samples taken in the presence of the Magistrate, ought to have been sent to the FSL for its chemical examination. Having not done so, the Investigating Agency has committed a grave error and as such, the FSL report would not help the case of the prosecution.
8. It would be worthwhile to mention here that by virtue of powers given under Section 52-A r.w. Section 76 of the NDPS Act, the Central Govt. Department of Finance issued a Gazette Notification dated 23.12.2022 regarding classification, seizing, sealing, storing, taking samples of the contraband etc. called as Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (seizure, search, sampling and disposal), Rules 2022 (hereinafter referred as ‘the Rules of 2022’). The said Rule came into force from 23.12.2022. It would be relevant to reproduce certain provisions, which are as under:-
(1) The narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and controlled substances seized under the Act shall be classified based on physical properties and results of the drug detection kit, if any, and shall be weighed separately.
(2) If the narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and
Mohammed Khalid and another v. The State of Telangana, Criminal Appeal No(S).1610 of 2023
Compliance with procedural safeguards under the NDPS Act is essential for the admissibility of evidence and the validity of convictions.
Compliance with procedural requirements under the NDPS Act is essential for the admissibility of evidence; failure to adhere to these provisions can lead to the suspension of sentences.
Non-compliance with Section 52A of the NDPS Act in evidence collection can lead to suspension of sentence, especially when prolonged custody and delays in appeal hearings are present.
Compliance with Section 52-A of the NDPS Act is essential for the validity of seizure and evidence, impacting the court's decision on bail and sentence suspension.
The court ruled that adherence to statutory procedures under the NDPS Act is essential for the admissibility of evidence, and allowed the suspension of sentence based on procedural violations.
Samples from narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances seized, shall be drawn on spot of recovery, in duplicate, in presence of search witnesses (Panchas).
Procedural compliance under the NDPS Act is crucial; failure to adhere to sampling and inventory requirements can undermine the prosecution's case and justify bail.
Procedural compliance in the NDPS Act is crucial for the admissibility of evidence, impacting the court's discretion in granting bail.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.