IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Vinit Kumar Mathur, J.
Ramdhani Yadav S/o Shri Ramchandra Yadav - Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj And Rural Development Department and ors. – Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14298/2019, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10613/2019, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11413/2019, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13128/2019, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13131/2019, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13440/2019, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15498/2019
Decided On : 08-10-2024
Regularization - Employment - Article 14, Article 39(d), Article 43 - The court interpreted the constitutional provisions regarding equal treatment and fair wages, emphasizing the right to regularization for long-serving temporary employees, influencing its decision to grant the petitioner's request for regularization and benefits.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner served as a temporary employee for 40 years, seeking regularization and pension after superannuation, arguing that his long service warranted equal treatment under the law.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner had continuously served in a capacity similar to a regular employee and that the state had failed to regularize his position despite multiple requests.
Issues: Whether the petitioner, having served for 40 years, is entitled to regularization and pension benefits despite being initially appointed on a temporary basis.
Ratio Decidendi: Long-term service in a temporary capacity can be deemed substantive, warranting regularization and benefits under constitutional provisions ensuring equality and fair treatment.
Result: The writ petition is allowed, directing regularization and release of pension benefits for the petitioner.
ORDER :
Vinit Kumar Mathur, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy involved in present cases is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6469/2020 “Kanhiya lal Nai Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.” decided on 30.09.2022 in the following terms:-
After abolishment of octroi in the State of Rajasthan, the Chief Executive Officer, Zila parishad, Bikaner enquired about the status of employees working at Gram Panchayat, Lunkaransar providing services related to octroi collection and consequently, had been rendered surplus. The Gram Panchayat, Lunkaransar furnished necessary details pertaining to all the employees who had been rendered surplus to the Zila Parishad, Bikaner.
An order dated 06.08.1998, was passed by the State Government stating inter alia that the employees who were working in connection with collection and management of octroi shall not be retrenched from services. Subsequently, the petitioner continued in the employment of Gram Panchayat, Lunkaransar uninterruptedly from the date of initial appointment i.e.14.08.1981. The Zila Parishad, Bikaner vide letter dated23.11.2007, forwarded a list of employees working in various Gram Panchayats falling under its jurisdiction for accommodation of employees on other posts who were rendered surplus due to abolition of octroi in the State of Rajasthan.
The Department of Rural Development and Panchayati Raj, Government of Rajasthan vide order dated 27.11.2016 allowed minimum pay-scale of class-IV to employees, who were discharging duties similar to the petitioner, after abolition of octroi. However, the name of the petitioner did not find a mention in the said list. The grievance raised in the present writ petition is that his services had been utilized by the respondent-department for40 years without any break yet the same had not been regularised, in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had continuously worked in the respondent-department for almost 40 years discharging duties in similar fashion as of a regular class-IV employee.
It was further submitted that Gram Panchayat, Lunkaransar and Zila Parishad, Bikaner had time and again requested the State Government through various communications along with furnishing necessary details, pertaining to the services discharged by the petitioner in the department for the purposes of regularisation but to no avail. Counsel also submitted that the petitioner had discharged duties in the respondent-department against the post of class-IV employee which were perennial in nature and it would be thus in violation of Article 39(d) r/w with Article 43 of the Constitution of India if regularisation of the petitioner in the pay scale applicable for employees working against class-IV posts is not allowed to him. Counsel urged that the petitioner during pendency of the writ petition had stood superannuated from services in the month of October 2021,therefore, respondents may be directed to release pension and other retiral benefits by regularising petitioner's services from the year 1981.
Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the petitioner was not appointed through regular mode of selection for class-IV post. It was also submitted that the petitioner was engaged by Gram Panchayat, Lunkaransar for collection of octroi on temporary basis, therefore after abolition of octroi in normal cours
Long-term temporary employees are entitled to regularization and benefits under constitutional provisions ensuring equality and fair treatment.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of employees to regularization after completing ten years of service on sanctioned and vacant posts, as supported by constitutional....
The entitlement to pensionary benefits for long-serving employees, even if initially appointed on a temporary basis, and the obligation of the State to provide minimum benefits for dedicated service.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the petitioner to regularization in his service against the lowest scale of pay permissible for Grade-IV employees within the PH....
Long and uninterrupted service under judicial protection legitimizes claims for regularization in public employment, irrespective of initial engagement irregularities.
Long-serving employees engaged under judicial orders are entitled to regularisation despite initial irregularities, emphasizing fairness and continuous service.
The court ruled that employees engaged continuously for over ten years are entitled to regularization, regardless of irregular appointment status, reaffirming precedents from the Supreme Court highli....
Lengthy service by an employee on ad-hoc basis, when performed against a sanctioned post, must be counted towards seniority and benefits, ensuring equitable treatment in state employment.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.