SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1720

ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Rohit Kumar Verma – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Monu Kumar
For the Respondent: Chandragupt Chopra, Manoj Kumar & Shyam Sunder Sharma

JUDGMENT :

ANIL KUMAR UPMAN, J.:— The petitioner has filed this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr. P.C. challenging the order dated 10.11.2022 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge No. 2, Jaipur Metro II (hereinafter referred to as ‘the revisional court’) in Criminal Revision No. 60/2022 (662/2022) whereby the learned revisional court allowed the revision preferred by the petitioner subject to cost of Rs. 10,000/- which is to be deposited with District Legal Services Authority, Jaipur and with a direction to pay Rs. 20,000/- to the complainant before the next date fixed in the trial.

2. The petitioner is facing trial in a criminal case No. 2757/2015 filed under Sec. 138 of the N.I. Act before the court of learned Special Metropolitan Magistrate (N.I. Act Cases) No. 6 Jaipur Metro II wherein his right to cross- examine Smt. Kesar Devi, wife of the complainant has been closed by the learned trial court. On 01.08.2022, the accused petitioner moved an application for reopening his right to cross-examine Smt Kesar Devi. The learned trial court vide order dated 07.09.2022 dismissed the application of the petitioner and posted the matter for statement of accused. Being aggriev

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top