Back
FARJAND ALI
Meera W/o Late Bhur Singh Dulawat – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER :
BY THE COURT
1. The instant Criminal Misc. Application for Bail Cancellation has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner Smt. Meera, who happens to be the complainant/wife of the deceased in the case pertaining to the FIR No.106/2022 registered at the Police Station Khamnor, District Rajsamand for offences under Sections 394, 302, and 120-B of the IPC. She is aggrieved of the order dated 22.12.2022 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nathdwara in Criminal Misc. Case No.233/2022 whereby the respondent Nos. 2 & 3, Ramniwas and Ranjeet were granted bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. by exercising powers with impropriety and sheer misuse of the discretion vested with the learned Sessions Judge concerned.
2. Bereft of the elaborate details, the brief facts of the case would be that an FIR No.106/2022 was lodged on 15.05.2022 at the Police Station Khamnor, District Rajsamand alleging inter alia that Bhur Singh, who was the father of the first informant Raju Singh and the husband of the petitioner, was found dead on a woven bed in his house. It was further alleged that some ornaments belonging to the deceased were also found missing and the suspicion was cast to the effec
Judicial discretion in bail matters must be exercised judiciously, requiring changed circumstances for successive applications.
Judicial discretion in granting bail must be exercised judiciously, with specific reasons provided, especially when prior applications have been denied.
The court established that a subsequent grant of bail by a higher court (Sessions Court) can be valid even after a prior dismissal by a lower court, provided the decision is well-reasoned and based o....
Cancellation of bail requires substantial grounds indicating misuse or misconduct; mere allegations of injustice without evidence do not suffice for revocation.
The court emphasized the importance of considering the facts of the case after the filing of the charge-sheet before granting bail and highlighted the impact of the cancellation of a previous bail or....
The court ruled that mere registration of a subsequent offence does not justify automatic bail cancellation; a thorough inquiry into supervening circumstances is necessary.
Cancellation of bail requires cogent evidence of supervening circumstances; mere subsequent charges do not automatically justify cancellation if they do not affect the original trial.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the misuse of bail and the legal principles governing the cancellation of bail.
Bail may be canceled when an accused violates conditions, especially if such violations threaten the integrity of a fair trial, as established by precedents.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
