Back
FARJAND ALI
Yashwant Kumar S/o Shri Swaminath – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The jurisdiction of this court has been invoked by way of filing an instant second bail application under Section 439 CrPC at the instance of accused-petitioner. The requisite details of the matter are tabulated herein below:
| S.No. | Particulars of the Case | |
| 1. | FIR Number | 64/2022 |
| 2. | Concerned Police Station | Taranagar |
| 3. | District | Churu |
| 4. | Offences alleged in the FIR | Sections 8/15, 25 & 29 of the NDPS Act |
| 5. | Offences added, if any | - |
| 6. | Date of passing of impugned order | 04.04.2023 |
2. The first bail application of petitioner came to be disposed of by this Court vide order dated 21.12.2022 passed in SBCRLMB No.15753/2022 with the liberty of file afresh after recording the statement of Seizing Officer. Now the statement of Seizing Officer is recorded. Hence, the instant bail application.
3. It is contended on behalf of the accused-petitioner that no case for the alleged offences is made out against him and his incarceration is not warranted. The petitioner is behind the bars since 27.02.2022. There are no factors at play in the case at hand that may work against grant of bail to the accused-petitioner and he has been made an accu
The court established that procedural compliance under the NDPS Act is crucial, and failure to adhere to such provisions can lead to the grant of bail even in serious cases.
The court ruled that non-compliance with mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act can lead to bail being granted despite statutory restrictions.
The court emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural requirements in drug seizure cases, ruling that non-compliance can render evidence inadmissible and affect bail decisions.
The court established that procedural non-compliance in drug seizure cases can justify bail, prioritizing individual liberty over statutory restrictions.
The court established that procedural compliance is crucial in drug-related cases, and significant lapses can warrant bail despite statutory restrictions.
Procedural non-compliance in drug seizure cases can lead to bail being granted, especially when the accused has been in custody for an extended period without trial.
Procedural compliance under the NDPS Act is crucial; failure to adhere to Section 52A can lead to the inadmissibility of evidence and impact bail decisions.
The court established that non-compliance with mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act can render evidence inadmissible, and that prolonged detention without trial can justify the grant of bail despite ....
Non-compliance with procedural requirements under the NDPS Act can undermine the prosecution's case and justify the grant of bail.
Procedural compliance under the NDPS Act is crucial for the admissibility of evidence, and failure to adhere to these provisions can lead to the grant of bail.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
