SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1892

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH
PANKAJ BHANDARI, BHUWAN GOYAL, JJ.
Harna @ Harnath Singh and Ors. - Appellants
Versus
The State of Rajasthan – Respondent
D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 137 of 1993
Decided On : 18-12-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :Mr. V.R. Bajwa, Senior Advocate, assisted by Ms. Savita Nathawat, Advocate.
For State : Mr. Javed Choudhary, Addl.G.A.
For Complainant :Mr. Rinesh Gupta, Advocate with Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate.

The right of private defense under IPC Sections 100 and 102 was upheld, leading to the acquittal of the accused as they acted in self-defense during the incident.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 100 and 102 - Right of private defense - Accused appellants convicted by the Trial Court for murder and sentenced to life imprisonment and other penalties - Appeal allowed, acquittal of accused appellants upheld as they acted in self-defense during an altercation, and the prosecution failed to establish their guilt beyond reasonable doubt. (Paras 1, 17)

(B) Conviction and Acquittal - Acquittal of several accused not challenged by the State - Finality of acquittal upheld. (Paras 5, 16)

Facts of the case:
The incident involved a dispute leading to gunfire, resulting in the death of Janak Singh and injuries to others. The prosecution's version was contradicted by medical evidence and witness statements. (Paras 3, 6, 13)

Findings of Court:
The evidence supported the defense's claim of acting in self-defense, leading to the conclusion that the accused were not guilty of the charges. (Paras 16, 17)

Issues: Whether the accused acted in self-defense and the validity of their convictions. (Paras 11, 12)

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the accused's actions fell within the right of private defense as defined in Sections 100 and 102 of IPC, emphasizing the necessity of reasonable apprehension of danger. (Paras 11, 17)

Result: Appeal allowed; accused acquitted of all charges.

JUDGMENT :

(Pankaj Bhandari, J.)

Accused appellants have filed the instant appeal aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 03.04.1993 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Hindaun City whereby all the accused appellants were acquitted for offence under Sections 147, 148, 302/149, 324/149, 323/149 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as "IPC") and appellant - Harna @ Harnath Singh has been convicted for offence under Section 302 of IPC and has been sentenced to life imprisonment along with a fine of Rs.1 Lac and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment of 7 years and accused appellants - Shyam Singh, Shivbhan, Shiv Singh and Babu Singh have been convicted for offence under Section 323 of IPC and have been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 6 months each.

2. During the pendency of the appeal, appellant No.4 - Shiv Singh has expired and the appeal stands abated qua appellant No.4 - Shiv Singh. Now, the appeal survives qua appellant Nos.1, 2, 3 and 5 - Harna @ Harnath Singh, Shyam Singh, Shivbhan and Babu Singh.

3. Succinctly stated the facts of the case are that on 27.10.1990 at 7:00 PM a written report (Exhibit-P1) was submitted at Police Station, Hindaun City by one Bharat Singh. It was inter-alia stated therein that some dispute took place between Rajendra son of Harna & Harnath Singh and Narsi - brother of complainant. Thereafter, Harna Singh fired his gun at Janak Singh, who expired and Harna Singh opened other fire towards persons, who came to intervene. In the FIR, allegations were levelled against 12 persons and Janak Singh expired. On the basis of said written report, police registered an FIR for offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 307 & 323 of IPC. The police after due investigation charge-sheeted 12 persons. The accused appellants and other co-accused denied the charges levelled against them and sought trial, upon which, on behalf of the prosecution, 14 witnesses were examined and 49 documents were exhibited. In defence, 1 witness was produced and as many as 20 documents were exhibited. The Court after examining the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. and after hearing the arguments has acquitted 7 of the accused and has convicted the present 5 accused appellants. Appellant No.1 - Harna @ Harnath Singh has been convicted for offence under Section 302 of IPC and rest of the appellants have been convicted for offence under Section 323 of IPC. Learned Trial Court has acquitted the accused appellants for rest of the offences. Aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and order of sentence, the appellants have preferred the present appeal before this Court.

4. It is contended by learned Senior Advocate, Mr. V.R. Bajwa, assisted by Ms. Savita Nathawat, Adv., appearing on behalf of the accused appellants that there was a cross-FIR and in fact, complainant side was the aggressor. They were convicted by learned Trial Court in cross-case and in appeal, the conviction order was upheld by the High Court and they were given benefit of probation. It is also contended that dispute took place in font of house of appellant No.1 - Harna Singh. All the persons from complainant side armed with weapons including firearms came to the house of Harna @ Harnath Singh and started the quarrel. Deceased - Janak Singh opened fire and Udai Singh received gunshot injuries. In self-defence, appellant No.1 - Harna @ Harnath Singh has also fired, which hit deceased- Janak Singh.

5. It is contended that learned Trial Court has acquitted seven of the accused. The acquittal of the seven accused is not challenged by the State. Similarly, the acquittal of the present accused appellants for offences under Sections 147, 148, 324/149 & 323/149 of IPC and appellant Nos.2, 3 & 5 for offence under Section 302/149 of IPC also has not been challenged. Thus, it has attained finality.

6. It is contended that Exhibit-D14 to Exhibit-D20 are the injury reports of the accused side.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top