SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1858

DINESH MEHTA
Subodh Kalyani – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Trilok Joshi
For the Respondent: Gaurav Singh
For the Complainant : Jayant Joshi

ORDER :

1. The instant petition under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 lays a challenge to the order dated 27.07.2023; passed by the learned Family Court No. 2, Bikaner (hereinafter referred to as “the Family Court”) in Criminal Case No. 83/2023 (original C.I.S. No. 482/2019), whereby petitioner's application dated 18.08.2022, preferred under section 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been rejected.

2. Briefly narrated facts appertains are that the petitioner married the respondent No. 2 on 18.02.2003. Thereafter, their matrimonial relationship became sour for which the petitioner and respondent No. 2 along with her two minor children started living separately.

3. The respondent No. 2 filed an application under section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking maintenance. During the course of proceedings, by way of the order dated 19.08.2023, passed by the learned Family Court, a sum of Rs. 30,000/- was determined as interim maintenance.

4. Both the parties have filed their affidavits in light of the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court rendered in the case of Rajnesh v. Neha, AIR 2021 SC 569.

5. In the affidavit so filed, petitioner so also re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top