SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1904

DINESH MEHTA
Dipesh Kumar Suthar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: O.P. Sangwa
For the Respondent: Pankaj Sharma

Table of Content
1. eligibility criteria based on educational marks. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. prior judgments set precedent for eligibility. (Para 4 , 5)
3. petitioner cannot challenge settled legal position. (Para 6 , 7)
4. writ petition and stay application dismissed. (Para 8 , 9)

ORDER :

1. The petitioner having secured 46% marks in Graduation was able to secure 55% marks in Post Graduation. He applied for the post of Teacher Grade III pursuant to advertisement dated 31.07.2018.

2. Though, the petitioner had cleared REET Examination, appointment was denied to him, as his marks in the Graduation were less than 50%.

3. Petitioner has approached this Court on the ground that since he has secured more than 50% marks in Post Graduation, he is eligible in the wake of amendment brought by NCTE vide Notification dated 13.11.2019, which has been given retrospective effect from the year 2011.

4. Mr. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General submitted that the issue in the present writ petition has already been set at rest by the Division Bench of this Court by its judgment dated 10.03.2022 rendered in the case of Dinesh Chandra Damor v. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1205/2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top