SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Raj) 1135

MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Narendra Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Saiyed Mehmood Shah – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Rachit Sharma
For the Respondent: Mr. Reashm Bharagava

JUDGMENT :

Mr. Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J. - This writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is preferred assailing the legality and validity of the order dated 05.03.2008 passed by the learned Additional District Judge (Fast Track) No.2, Ajmer (for brevity "the learned trial Court") in Civil Miscellaneous Case No.33/2007, (48/2004, 21/2004) whereby, an application filed by the petitioners/defendants (for short "the defendants") under Section 10 read with section 151 CPC has been dismissed.

2. The relevant facts in brief are that the respondent No.1/plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as "the plaintiff") filed a suit for declaration wherein, the defendants filed an application under Section 10 read with section 151 CPC seeking stay of the suit on the premise that an earlier suit No.72/2003 between the parties pertaining to selfsame property is pending consideration. The application has been dismissed by the learned trial Court vide order dated 05.03.2008.

3. Assailing the impugned order, learned counsel for the defendants submits that since, in both the suits, the parties as well as the suit property are same, the learned trial Court erred in dismissing their application

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top