SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Raj) 1177

NUPUR BHATI
Rohit Jora – Appellant
Versus
Jamna Jakhar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Sanjeet Purohit and Mr. Mudit Nagpal.
For the Respondent: Mr. Vijay Kumar Purohit and Mr. Dalpat Singh Solanki.

ORDER :

(Nupur Bhati, J.)

The petitioner has preferred this writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgments and decrees dated 24.12.2018 (Annex.9) and 22.08.2023 (Annex.11) passed by Rent Tribunal, Sri Ganganagar and Appellate Rent Tribunal, Sri Ganganagar respectively, whereby application preferred by respondent/landlady under Section 9 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 ('Act of 2001') seeking eviction of the petitioner/tenant from the suit shop has been allowed and certificate of possession has been issued in favour of respondent/landlady. The Rent Tribunal, Sri Ganganagar also directed the petitioner to pay mesne profit three times of the monthly rent to the landlady.

2. The apposite for the purpose of disposal of this writ petition are that the respondent/landlady had preferred application under Section 9 of the Act of 2001 on 04.04.2016 seeking eviction of the petitioner/tenant from the suit premises i.e. shop measuring 10'x30' situated at C-Block, Sri Ganganagar, which was initially let out on a monthly rent of Rs.2325/- under an agreement dated 16.11.2006. In the application, it was inter-alia averred by the respondent tha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top