SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Raj) 1161

NUPUR BHATI
Manohar Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Sanjeet Purohit, Mr. Mudit Nagpal.
For the Respondents: Mr. Mahaveer Bishnoi, AAG and Mr. Gaurav Bishnoi.

ORDER :

(Nupur Bhati, J.)

Though the matter has been listed in the 'Fresh' category, at the joint request of both the parties, the matter is heard finally today itself.

2. This writ petition has been filed challenging the communication dated 21.04.2024 (Annex.21) issued by the respondent no. 2 whereby the petitioner was informed that the mining lease of the petitioner was coming to an end from 09.05.2024. The petitioner also prayed that the respondent authorities be restrained from terminating the mining lease on 09.05.2024 and taking any coercive action against the petitioner. The petitioner has also sought directions to the respondent no. 3 to issue EC in favour of the petitioner and also the cost of the writ petition to be allowed in favour of the petitioner. Certain ancillary relief(s) have also been sought by the petitioner.

3. Briefly stated, the facts of this petition are that the petitioner applied for the mining lease of mineral bajri in the 376.5088 hectare area situated in Tehsil Amet, District Rajsamand ) 'mining lease area' in the year 2013 and vide order dated 26.02.2013 (Annex.1), the Joint Secretary to the Government, approved the mining lease for 5 years in favour o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top