Back
NUPUR BHATI
Netu Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Nupur Bhati, J.)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy involved in the writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment dated 11.01.2021 passed in SB Civil Writ Petition No.11384/2020 (Balveer Bana v. State of Rajasthan and other connected matters) which is reproduced herein below:-
Mr M.S.Singhvi - learned Advocate General - Senior Counsel assisted by ish Sankh
License holders cannot challenge the terms of the contract under the Writ Jurisdiction and the state has a duty to provide good quality liquor to consumers and prevent illegal transportation of liquo....
The court emphasized that parties entering into contracts are bound by the terms and conditions and cannot challenge them under the Writ Jurisdiction. The state's objective of providing good quality ....
Contractual obligations under the Excise Policy cannot be challenged in writ jurisdiction if entered knowingly, supporting state regulation for public health.
Contractual obligations under the Excise Policy cannot be challenged in writ jurisdiction if entered knowingly, and the state has a duty to regulate liquor quality.
Contractual obligations under the Excise Policy cannot be challenged in writ jurisdiction if entered knowingly, and the state has a duty to regulate liquor quality.
There is no fundamental right to trade in liquor; state policies can modify licensing rights as long as they comply with statutory provisions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
