Vinod Kumar vs Maniram - 2023 Supreme(Raj) 2284

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2284

NUPUR BHATI
Vinod Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Maniram – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Rajender Kumar Soni, Advocate.

ORDER :

(Nupur Bhati, J.)

The instant writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India with the following prayers:-

"that the writ petition of the petitioner may kindly be allowed with costs and the impugned Order passed by learned Addl. District Judge, Sadulshahar, District Sri. Ganganagar on 03/08/2023 (Annexure-5) as well as the order dated 26/05/2023 (Annexure-4) passed by learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sadulshahar may kindly be quashed and set-aside and application under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 read with Sec. 151 C.P.C. filed by the petitioner in Civil Misc. Case No. 16/2019 Vinod Kumar v. Maniram & Anr. may kindly be allowed as prayed."

2. Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff-petitioner filed a suit (Annexure-1) for permanent injunction against the defendant respondents before learned Civil Judge, Sadulshahar. The plaintiff-petitioner also filed an application under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 read with section 151 of C.P.C. for temporary injunction while praying that till final disposal of the suit, the respondents Maniram S/o Shri. Sahiram and Saroj W/o Shri. Maniram may be restrained from interfering in the land in dis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document