SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1994

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Rekha Borana, J.
Bheru Lal Patel – Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan and Others – Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13455 of 2022
Decided On : 15-12-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Deelip Kawadia
For the Respondents: M.S. Singhvi, K.S. Lodha

The court ruled that preliminary enquiries under the Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act are administrative and do not constitute final decisions, allowing for interim orders to be vacated.

Headnote:(A) Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 - Sections 55 and 57 - Writ petition challenging interim order staying enquiry proceedings initiated against petitioner for alleged misconduct - Court held that the enquiry is administrative, not final, and interim order vacated as no final decision made. (Paras 1-12)

(B) Writ Jurisdiction - Maintainability of writ petition challenged on grounds of alternative remedy available under Section 107 of the Act - Court affirmed that interim relief cannot be granted as the petitioner has not yet been aggrieved by a final order. (Paras 3-12)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged notices issued under the Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act regarding an enquiry into his alleged misconduct concerning receiving unauthorized gifts. The enquiry was initiated following complaints against him and others.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the enquiry was merely preliminary and administrative, and the petitioner had not been aggrieved by any final order.

Issues: The main issues were the maintainability of the writ petition in light of alternative remedies and whether the enquiry was validly initiated.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the enquiry was in accordance with the Act and that no final decision had been made against the petitioner, thus the interim order was vacated.

Result: Interim order vacated; application allowed.

ORDER :

1. The matter comes up on an application under Article 226(3) of the Constitution of India for vacation of the interim order dated 03.11.2022 whereby the proceedings before the Registrar in pursuance to the notices dated 30.05.2022 (Annexure-5) and 22.07.2022 (Annexure-7) had been stayed.

2. The present writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner with the following submissions:

    (i) Order dated 30.05.2022 (Annexure-5) was issued by respondent No. 3 Institutional Development Officer (IDO) under Section 55 of the Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 2001') whereby an Enquiry Officer was appointed to enquire into the allegations as made vide complaints by the Presidents of various Primary Milk Samitis against the Chairman and other members of the Managing Board of Udaipur Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari Sangh Limited and certain other Boards/Samiti. The said order specified two points for enquiry.

    Vide amended order dated 03.06.2022, third point for enquiry was also added vide which it was specified that if during the enquiry proceedings any other point for enquiry is found, the same would also be included.

    (ii) The enquiry in terms of Section 55(1) was conducted by the Enquiry Officer and in terms of the enquiry report dated 17.06.2022 submitted by him, the result of the enquiry was declared on 05.07.2022. As per the said result, certain officials/members of the Management Board were prima facie found guilty. Therefore, in terms of Section 57(1) of the Act of 2001, notice dated 22.07.2022 was served on all 42 members, specifying the details of the allegation/charge as levelled against them and calling upon them to appear on 08.08.2022 along with the reply and supporting documents, if any.

    So far as the present petitioner is concerned, he was alleged to have received bonus/ex gratia/ incentive/memento/gift amounts dehors the Rules. The amount qua said illegally received gifts/incentive was quantified to be Rs. 1,07,972/-.

    (iii) The petitioner submitted a detailed reply to notice dated 22.07.2022 on 16.08.2022. However, without considering the objections raised by him in the reply, the Enquiry Officer as appointed in terms of Section 57(1) of the Act of 2001, submitted his Enquiry Report dated 17.08.2022 whereby the petitioner was found guilty of receiving the above mentioned amount/gifts/mementos dehors the Rules. In terms of said Enquiry Report, the Enquiry Officer(Additional Registrar, Co- operative Societies, Jaipur) recommended for action in terms of Section 57(2) read with Rule 76(2) of the Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Rules, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules of 2003').

    In pursuance thereof, notice dated 29.08.2022 was served calling upon all the 42 incumbents, including the petitioner, to appear on 16.09.2022 and to submit their defence on the said date. It is against the said notice dated 29.08.2022 (Annexure-11) and all the prior notices that the present writ petition has been preferred.

3. Vide interim order dated 03.11.2022, the proceedings before the Registrar in pursuance to the notice dated 30.05.2022 (Annexure-5) and notice dated 22.07.2022 (Anneuxre-7) were stayed and an application for vacation of the said interim order has been preferred on behalf of the respondents. Learned Advocate General made the following submissions:

    (a) The present writ petition itself is not maintainable in view of the alternative remedy of revision under Section 107 of the Act of 2001. Section 107 not only provides for a revision against an order passed by any officer subordinate to the Registrar/Registrar but also empowers the Registrar/State Government to pass an interlocutory order. Therefore, the interim order if any, can even be granted by the State Government/Registrar under Section 107 and hence it cannot be said that the said remedy is not effective or efficacious one.

    (b) Vide the interim order the proceedings in pursuance to notices dated 30.05.2022 and 22.07.2022 have been

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top