SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2076

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Vinita Tak – Appellant
Versus
None – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Mohan Ram Suthar.

ORDER :

(Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J.)

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred claiming the following reliefs :-

    "1. Order impugned dated 07.08.2023 (Annexure 3) passed by the learned Judge, Family Court No.1, Jodhpur in Civil Case No.686/2023 (214/2023) (NCV No.688/2023) may kindly be quashed and set aside.

    2. It may kindly be ordered to be allowed the application of the petitioners under Section 13-B of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT as prayed and ordered to issued the divorce decree.

    3. Any other writ order or direction, which is favourable to the petitioners, may kindly be passed, as an alternative relief.

    Any other order favourable to the petitioner may also be passed."

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners jointly submits that the marriage of the petitioners was solemnized with Hindu rites and ritual on 19.04.2022 and are living separately from last more than one year. Learned counsel further submits that the conciliation efforts have been made by both the parties with the help of family members and elders of the society. Learned counsel also submits that the both the petitioners arrived at a joint settlement to part ways as the marriage has irr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top