SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2095

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Sohanlal Bagri Bagria – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Vipul Dharnia a/w Mr. Udit Mathur.
For the Respondents: Ms. Bhawna Jangid.

JUDGMENT :

(Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J.)

The matter pertains to the year 2005, thus, was listed under the category "Oldest Cases for Early Disposal".

2. This writ petition has been preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India claiming the following reliefs:

    "It is therefore mostly humbly and respectfully prayed that by appropriate writ order or direction it is most humbly and respectfully prayed that:-

    The present petition may kindly be allowed. The petitioner may be held entitled for grant of selection grade as soon as he completes 18 years of service from the date of his initial appointment. The respondents be further directed to make the payment of the above benefit along with the interest @18% per annum on the above arrears to the petitioner forthwith.

    That any other order which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may kindly be passed in favour of the Petitioner.

    That costs of the petition may be awarded in favour of the petitioner."

3. Brief facts of the case, as placed before this Court by learned counsel for the petitioner, are that the petitioner was appointed as a Teacher on temporary basis vide office order dated 07.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top