SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2055

FARJAND ALI
Gani Mohammad – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Sudhir Jain and Mr. Ali Mohammed Khan, Advocates.
For the Respondent: Mr. S.S. Mahala, PP.

ORDER :

Farjand Ali, J.

Heard learned counsel for the accused appellants and learned Public Prosecutor on the application for suspension of sentence and perused the judgment impugned dated 26.09.2019 passed by Special Judge (N.D.P.S. cases) Bhawanimandi, Jhalawar in Sessions case No. 36/2016(old No. 15/2014) whereby the accused appellants has been convicted for the offence punishable under sections 8/18 of NDPS Act and have been sentenced with maximum of twenty years rigorous imprisonment along with fine of Rs. 2,00,000/- as well as under sections 8/21 of NDPS Act and have been sentenced with maximum of twenty years rigorous imprisonment along with fine of Rs. 2,00,000/-.

2. Learned counsel for the appellants vehemently submits that the mandatory provisions of NDPS Act have not been complied with, thus, on this count, the recovery of the contraband is vitiated. The appellants has spent last 8 years and 9 months in custody, if they is not released on bail the very purpose of filing the appeal would be frustrated. He places reliance on the judgment dated 27.08.2022 passed by this Court in SB Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No. 12906/2022 titled as Suraj v. State of Rajasthan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top