SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Raj) 1350

MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Subhash Chandra – Appellant
Versus
Arun Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Sajjan Singh, Mr. Prashant Tatia
For the Respondent: Mr. Trilok Joshi

JUDGMENT :

Madan Gopal Vyas, J.

S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 90/2017

The present Civil Revision Petition under section 115 of the CPC has been preferred by the petitioner-judgment debtor against the order dated 01.04.2017 passed by the learned Additional District Judge No. 1, Hanumangarh (hereinafter referred to as the learned Appellate Court) in Civil Misc. Appeal No. 24/2016, whereby the learned Appellate Court rejected the appeal. The order dated 31.08.2016 passed by the learned Additional Senior Civil Judge, Hanumangarh (hereinafter referred to as the learned Executing/trial Court), whereby the learned Executing Court rejected the application filed by the petitioner under section 28 of the Specific Relief Act in Civil Misc. Case No. 06/2011.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff-decree holder preferred a suit seeking decree of specific performance of agreement to sale dated 25.02.1988. The learned trial Court vide judgment and decree dated 07.08.1998 decreed the suit in the following manner:-

^^vkns'k gS fd oknh v:.k dqekj iq= cyjke f[kysjh tkfr tkV fuoklh Qrsgxढ+ rglhy guqekuxढ+ dk ;g okn fo:} izfroknh lqHkk"k pUnz ckcr fofufnZ"V ikyuk foØ; vuqca/k fnukad 25-2-88 H

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top