ORDER :

Ganesh Ram Meena, J.

The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner/defendant assailing the order dated 19.02.2019 passed by the Court of learned Addl. District Judge No.11, Jaipur Metropolitan (for short 'the court below') in Suit No.44/2014 (426/2014) whereby the application filed by the respondent/ plaintiff under Order 6, Rule 17 CPC for seeking amendments in the plaint was allowed.

2. The respondent/ plaintiff filed a suit for declaration, possession and permanent injunction impleading only Radhakrishan Sadhumalani as a defendant. An application was filed by the respondent / plaintiff under Order 6, Rule 17 read with section 151 CPC for seeking following amendments:-

7- ;g fd okn i= dh en la[;k 6 ¼d½ fuEu izdkj c<+k;k tk;s%&
6- ¼d½ ;g fd izfroknh Øe 1 us nkSjkus nkok izfroknh Øe 2 }kjk tkjh QthZ vkaoVu i= fnukad
10-01-1990 dk iVVk e; uD'kk o jlhn is'k dh gSa] tks fjdkMZ ij fy;s x;s ftuls oknh dks irk pyk fd izfroknh Øe 2 ds v/;{k foosd xqIrk us viuh 'kfDr;ksa dk nq:i;ksx djrs gq;s oknh dks vkoafVr O;olkf;d ,oa vkoklh; Hkwfe {ks=Qy 222-22 oxZxt dks rhu Hkw[k.M cukdj izfroknh Øe 1 ds gd esa QthZ vkaoVu i= oknh ds ckn fnuakd 10-01-1990 dk tkjh dj fn;k gS] ftlesa foosd xqIrk us izfroknh Øe 1 ds gd esa tkjh vkoaVu i= esa cnfu;rh ls ykyp ds o'khHkwr gksdj fcuk vf/kdkj oknh dks vakofVr Hkwfe esa gh rhu Hkw[k.M ftlesa vkolh; Hkw[k.M ds&42 ftldk dqy {ks=Qy 150 oxZxt] O;olkf;d Hkw[k.M ds,l&49 {ks=Qy 22-22 oxZxt rFkk ds,l&50 {ks=Qy 22-22 oxZxt dk fiNyh rkjh[k fnukad 10-01-1990 esa cukdj tkjh dj fn;k gS] izfroknh Øe 2 ds }kjk tkjh fd;s x;s QthZ iVVs ls oknh ikcUn ugha gS vkSj uk gh bl QthZ vkaoVu ds vk/kkj ij izfroknh dks dksbZ vf/kdkj izkIr gksrs gS] bl izdkj izfroknh Øe 1 ds gd esas tkjh vkoaVu i= fnukad 10-01-1990 oknh ds fo:) voS/kkfud o 'kwU; izHkkoh gSA
8- ;g fd okn i= ds en la[;k 13 ¼[k½ dh pkSFkh iafDr esa 49 ,ao cuk;s x;s ds chp ds,l&50 tksMk tk;s rFkk blh en ds var esa fuEu bckjr c<+k;h tk;s%&
^^izfroknh Øe 1 ds gd esa izfroknh Øe 2 ds }kjk oknh dks vkaofVr Hkwfe dks gh fcuk vf/kdkj ds vkaoVu ckcr~ tkjh fd;k x;k vkaoVu i= fnukad 10-01-1990 voS/kkfud 'kwU; ,oa vizHkkoh gSA**

3. In the reply to the application it was stated by the respondent/ plaintiff that the amendments sought by the plaintiff are neither bonafide nor necessary for proper adjudication of the issue. It was also stated that there is no defendant No.2 as has been mentioned in the amendments being sought by the plaintiff.

4. Counsel appearing for the petitioner/ defendant submits that by way of the application under Order 6, Rule 17 read with section 151 CPC the / respondent/plaintiff wants to add that the defendant No.1 has placed on record the forged allotment letter dated 10.01.1990 issued by the defendant No.2 and also by amendments he is seeking relief that the allotment letter dated 10.01.1990 issued by the defendant No.2 be declared illegal, void and ineffective. He further submits that there is no defendant No.2 in the suit and also there are pleadings in the plaint in regard to the amendments which the respondent/ plaintiff wants to make. He further submits that on the basis of the pleadings the issue No.2 has already been framed by the court below on 29.01.2015. Therefore, the order of the court below allowing the amendments is wholly illegal and deserves to be quashed and set aside.

5. Counsel appearing for the respondent/ plaintiff submits that the amendments which are being sought by the respondent/plaintiff and have been allowed by the court below, are proper for adjudication of the dispute between the parties and it will not change the nature of the suit. He further submits that the order allowing the amendments in no manner will prejudice to the petitioner/ defendant.

6. Heard both the counsels appearing for the respective parties.

7. Order 6, Rule 17 CPC provides for provisions in regard to seeking amendment in the pleadings. Order 6, Rule 17 CPC is quoted as under:-

"17. Amendment of pleadings.- The Court may at any stage of the proceedi