MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Madan Singh S/o Pola Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The petitioner has filed the present criminal revision petition being aggrieved by the judgment dt. 15.12.2023 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Hanumangarh in Appeal No. 01/2020 whereby, the appellate court dismissed the appeal and upheld the order passed by Gram Nyayalay, Hanumangarh, in Criminal Case No. 210/2019, whereby, learned trial court acquitted the respondents Bhura Singh and Baltej Singh from the offence under Sections 448, 323, 341, 34 IPC but while convicting the accused respondents Jaskaran Singh and Ranjeet Singh, granted the benefit of probation under Section 4 of Probation of Offenders Act.
2. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the petitioner complainant lodged a written report before SHO, Police station Mahila Thana against the respondents stating therein that on 07.02.2014, at about 7:30 PM, when he was at his house, the accused Bhura Singh, Jaskaran, his wife and brother in law Baltej Singh armed with weapons forcibly entered into his house and started beating him and his wife due to which they sustained injuries.
3. On this report, the FIR was registered and the police started investigation. After inve
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt; acquittals should not be interfered with unless compelling reasons exist.
The principle that an acquittal should not be disturbed unless there are compelling reasons, and the presumption of innocence is reinforced by such acquittal.
Courts will only interfere with a judgment of acquittal in compelling circumstances, ensuring the presumption of innocence is maintained.
Interference in acquittal requires compelling reasons; the presumption of innocence is reinforced by acquittal.
The court emphasized that acquittal judgments should not be interfered with unless they are palpably erroneous or contrary to evidence, reinforcing the presumption of innocence.
The court upheld the acquittal of the accused due to lack of compelling evidence, emphasizing the presumption of innocence.
An acquittal strengthens the presumption of innocence, and an appellate court can only overturn such a judgment if it finds that the trial court's conclusion was unreasonable or unsupported by eviden....
The aim of Section 360 Cr.P.C. and Sections 3 and 4 of Probation of Offenders Act is to prevent offenders from being committed to jail, serving the dual purpose of deterrence and reformation.
The appellate court's decision to grant probation to convicted offenders was upheld as just and proper, despite the petitioners' claims of sufficient evidence against them.
The appellate court must uphold acquittals unless there is clear error in the trial court's evaluation of evidence, respecting the presumption of innocence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.