HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
ARUN MONGA, J.
Akshay Kalla, S/o. Shri Kailash Swaroop Kalla and Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Home Department, Government Of Rajasthan and Ors. - Respondents
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1732 Of 2023 Connected With S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1176 Of 2024
Decided On : 09-10-2024
(A) Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act - FIRs against management of Creative Credit Corporation Society - Allegations of mismanagement and financial irregularities - Clubbing of FIRs sought to ensure fair trial and reduce administrative burden - Court agrees with prior judgment emphasizing the need for a smooth trial process. (Paras 5, 6, 7, 8)
(B) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita - Section 447 - High Court's power to transfer cases for fair trial - Court affirms its discretion to consolidate cases for efficiency and justice. (Paras 8, 9)
Facts of the case:
Multiple FIRs were filed against the petitioners, former management of the Creative Credit Corporation Society, alleging financial misconduct amid the society's financial distress due to Covid-19.
Findings of Court:
The court directed the clubbing of FIRs to facilitate a fair trial and reduce the burden on the judicial system.
Issues: The main issues were the necessity of clubbing FIRs for a fair trial and the court's authority to transfer cases.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that clubbing FIRs is essential to prevent a miscarriage of justice and ensure efficient legal proceedings.
Result: Petitions partly allowed with directions for clubbing FIRs and consideration for bail in the principal FIR.
JUDGMENT :
(Arun Monga, J.)
1. Above titled two petitions are with common prayer seeking the clubbing of multiple FIRs registered against the petitioners at different police stations in State of Rajasthan. Allegations are mismanagement, embezzlement, and financial irregularities in conducting the affairs of registered society namely Creative Credit Corporation Society Limited (Society- for short). The petitioners/accused were at the helm of affairs of the society at the relevant time.
2. The FIRs have been registered on the complaint of the subsequent management of which the complainants are currently the executive members. It appears that almost each executive member has lodged an independent FIR based on similar facts and allegations at different police stations. More of it later.
3. Before adverting to the merits of the case, it would be apposite to have a look at the relevant facts leading to the institution of the present petitions. For convenience, the recitals and narrative herein is taken from S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No.1732/2023, which is as below:-
3.1. Creative Credit Cooperative Society was registered under the provisions of the Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act about 17 years ago. It is governed as per its bye-laws framed as per the provisions of the Act. It has got a Board of Directors elected by its members. The Society is in business of accepting financial deposits contributed by its members, which money is in turn then utilized for lending to those of the members who seek loans as per the bye-laws.
3.2. On account of Covid-19, loanee members of the Society defaulted in serving the debts. All such loans thus turned into Non Performing Assets (NPA). In fact, during the Covid-19 period, under the orders passed by competent government authorities, the society was restrained from causing recovery of debts from its borrowers for 6 months. Resultantly, Society plunged into serious financial hardship and was unable to pay back to its depositors when they sought refund of their deposits. Approximately 159 criminal complaints were filed under Section 138 of the N.I. Act by the depositors/members of the society, which are sub judice. On the other hand, society has filed around 195 recovery proceedings against the borrowers which too are pending.
3.3. Since the Society was unable to pay the depositors/members, a General Meeting of the Members was called, wherein it was decided to liquidation of the Society.
3.4. The Society then filed a writ petition (SBCWP No.17943/2021) before this Court, wherein vide order dated 11.01.2022 directions were given to the Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, to expeditiously decide the liquidation application filed by the Society. However, the liquidation application is still pending till date. In the meanwhile, the depositors/members of the Society lodged several FIRs against the petitioners, who were in the erstwhile management of the society at the relevant time.
4. In the aforesaid backdrop, I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and have perused the case file and gone through the nature of allegations contained in the different FIRs as enumerated in both the petitions.
5. My attention has been drawn to a judgment/order rendered in Vikram Singh v. State of Rajasthan, S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1479/2023 dated 23.08.2024 by a coordinate Bench of this Court presided over by my learned brother Farzand Ali, J., wherein somewhat similar money dispute pertaining to another Society namely Sanjivani Credit Cooperative Society is involved. Relevant of the said judgment is reproduced hereinbelow:-
The court emphasized the necessity of clubbing FIRs to ensure a fair trial and reduce judicial burden, affirming its discretion under the Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act and Bharatiya Nagarik Su....
The court ruled against the clubbing of FIRs from multiple States citing unique factual circumstances in each case, which undermines practical consolidation.
The Court ruled for the consolidation of multiple FIR trials involving similar allegations to uphold the right to a fair and speedy trial.
Multiple FIRs alleging identical offences cannot be consolidated if they arise from distinct transactions involving different complainants and evidence.
The court emphasized that multiplicity of proceedings would not be in the larger public interest and directed the clubbing of FIRs state-wise for one trial, allowing subsequent FIRs to be treated as ....
The court ruled that multiple FIRs for the same cause of action infringe the accused's right to a speedy trial, necessitating consolidation of cases for efficient judicial proceedings.
The court emphasized the specific nature of the offenses under different State enactments and recent judgments in declining to grant the relief sought by the petitioner under Article 32 of the Consti....
The court emphasized the necessity of clubbing related FIRs for a unified investigation to prevent conflicting outcomes and ensure justice.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.