ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Jagdish Prasad Son of Shri Kalluram – Appellant
Versus
Arvind Kumar Son of Shri Thanduram – Respondent
ORDER :
Anoop Kumar Dhand, J.
1. In compliance of the order dated 27.09.2024 passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 602/2024, this petition was taken up for final disposal and with the consent of learned counsels for the parties, final arguments have been heard and the order was reserved on 06.11.2024.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied by the impugned judgment dated 15.02.2023 passed by the Additional Senior Civil Judge No.3 District Alwar by which the Election Petition, filed by the respondent No. 1 under Section 43 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 (for short, ‘the Act of 1994’) and Rule 80 of the Rajasthan Panchayti Raj (Election), Rules 1994 (for short, ‘the Rules of 1994’), has been allowed and the petitioner has been declared as disqualified to hold the post of Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Bhuriyawas, Panchayat Samiti, Thanagaji, District Alwar and further a direction has been issued to the District Collector, Alwar to proceed in accordance with law.
3. A challenge has also been made to the order dated 10.04.2023 passed by the Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Thanagaji, District A
Brij Mohan Singh Vs. Priya Brat Narain Sinha and Ors. AIR 1965 SC 282
Birad Mal Singhvi Vs. Anand Purohit AIR 1988 SC 1796
Joshan Gouda Vs. Brindaban Gouda and Anr. 2012(5) SCC 634
Rishipal Singh Solanki Vs. State of U.P and Ors. 2022 (8) SCC 602
Birad Mal Singhvi Vs. Anand Purohit AIR 1988 SC 1796
Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Vs. K.S. Gandhi (1991)2 SCC 716
Narayan Govind Gavate Vs. State of Maharashtra (1977) 1 SCC 133
The court upheld the disqualification of a Sarpanch candidate for having children after the statutory cut-off date, emphasizing the primacy of official records over private documents in determining e....
Matriculation certificates are authoritative for age determination in election matters, unless contradicted by unimpeachable evidence.
Election candidates must provide authentic documentation. Discrepancies in age and qualifications may lead to disqualification.
Failure to disclose accurate age disqualifies election candidates under Section 43-AA(b) of the Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, establishing the importance of truthful declarations and burden of pr....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.