Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, C.J., GANESH RAM MEENA, J.
Suresh Chand Gupta S/o Shri Babulal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9182 of 2024, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5171 of 2024, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7345 of 2024, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7741 of 2024, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8605 of 2024, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9094 of 2024, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10575 of 2024, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10979 of 2024, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13209 of 2024, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5889 of 2024, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5943 of 2024, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6254 of 2024, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7785 of 2024, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7867 of 2024, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10552 of 2024, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11121 of 2024, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12410 of 2024, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13183 of 2024, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13822 of 2024, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14218 of 2024, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14512 of 2024, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14960 of 2024,
Decided on : 18-10-2024
ORDER :
1. After the order was passed by this Court earlier on 20.09.2024, new developments have been brought to the notice of this Court, one of them regarding dismissal of the Review Petition by the Hon’ble Supreme Court filed in the case of State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Dr. Mahesh Chandra Sharma on 15.10.2024 as stated at the bar by learned counsel for the petitioners Mr. Rishabh Khandelwal.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has also placed before this Court order dated 27.09.2024 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of The State of Rajashtan & Ors. Vs. Pyare Lal Meena & Ors. (Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.10560/2024), wherein, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has clarified that there is no stay on the judgment of the High Court and further that in the event the outstanding towards salary has not been paid, the same shall be cleared within a period of one week.
3. In view of the above developments, we need not keep these petitions pending and same are also finally disposed off in terms of order passed earlier by this Court in the case of Dr. Mahesh Chandra Sharma & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. and other connected matters (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13496/2021), decided on 13.07.2022. The petitioners will be entitled to the same relief as was granted in the aforesaid cases meaning thereby that they are entitled to continue with all consequential benefits including monetary benefits in service upto the age of 62 years, if they have not already attained the age of 62 years. In cases where the petitioners have already attained the age of 62 years, they will be entitled to all the consequential benefits including monetary benefits of salary as if they had continued in service upto the age of 62 years.
The court affirmed the entitlement of petitioners to service benefits until age 62, clarifying the implications of previous rulings.
Retired employees are deemed to have continued in service until age 62, entitling them to pensions and benefits.
The court established that the relief for unpaid salaries and benefits is contingent upon the outcomes of ongoing Supreme Court proceedings and existing legal frameworks.
Service Matter - Suspension - Quashed - When impugned punishment order has been quashed, petitioner shall be restored back in a position which stood on date of passing such order which has been quash....
The court upheld the retirement age of 60 for employees of a public sector undertaking, declaring attempts to roll back this age unauthorized without Cabinet approval.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
